arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1102.3453physics.ed-ph
收藏

学生如何在解决物理问题中融合概念和形式的数学推理

How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems

Eric Kuo, Michael M. Hull, Ayush Gupta, Andrew Elby

摘要:

目前的专家解决问题的概念将物理/概念推理和形式数学推理描述为独立的步骤:一个好的问题解决者首先将物理问题转化为一个物理问题当前的物理定量解决问题的专业知识概念以两种方式结合概念推理:选择相关方程(在操作它们之前),以及检查给定的定量解决方案是否合理(在操作方程之后)。我们提出的情况下,解决问题的专业知识应该包括机会主义混合概念和正式的数学推理,即使在操纵方程。我们目前的分析采访了两个学生,亚历克斯和帕特。受访学生被要求解释一个特定的方程,并使用该方程解决一个问题。亚历克斯使用并描述了作为计算工具的方程。相比之下,帕特找到了解决问题的捷径。他的捷径混合了数学运算和关于物理过程的概念推理,反映了一种观点--在他之前对方程的解释中表达过--方程可以表达一种总体的概念意义。使用亚历克斯和帕特的案例研究,我们认为,这种机会主义的概念和形式的数学推理的混合(i)是解决问题的专业知识的一部分,(ii)可以描述的认知元素称为符号形式(Sherin,2001),(iii)是一个可行的教学目标。

英文摘要:

Current conceptions of expert problem solving depict physical/conceptual reasoning and formal mathematical reasoning as separate steps: a good problem solver first translates a physical Current conceptions of quantitative problem-solving expertise in physics incorporate conceptual reasoning in two ways: for selecting relevant equations (before manipulating them), and for checking whether a given quantitative solution is reasonable (after manipulating the equations). We make the case that problem-solving expertise should include opportunistically blending conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning even while manipulating equations. We present analysis of interviews with two students, Alex and Pat. Interviewed students were asked to explain a particular equation and solve a problem using that equation. Alex used and described the equation as a computational tool. By contrast, Pat found a shortcut to solve the problem. His shortcut blended mathematical operations with conceptual reasoning about physical processes, reflecting a view - expressed earlier in his explanation of the equation - that equations can express an overarching conceptual meaning. Using case studies of Alex and Pat, we argue that this opportunistic blending of conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning (i) is a part of problem-solving expertise, (ii) can be described in terms of cognitive elements called symbolic forms (Sherin, 2001), and (iii) is a feasible instructional target.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑