arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2007.01355physics.ed-ph
收藏

基于证据的翻转课堂或主动参与型非翻转课程对大学物理入门课程中学生表现的影响

Impact of evidence-based flipped or active-engagement non-flipped courses on student performance in introductory physics

Nafis I Karim, Alexandru Maries, Chandralekha Singh

AI总结:

本研究比较了基于证据的主动参与(EBAE)策略与基于讲授(LB)教学对大学物理入门课程学生表现的影响,发现在教学前预测无显著差异的情况下,EBAE课程学生在概念测试上平均表现更优。

摘要:

我们描述了基于物理教育研究的教学法在翻转课堂和主动参与型非翻转课程中,对学生经验证的概念测试表现的影响。我们将显著使用基于证据的主动参与(EBAE)策略的课程与主要使用基于讲授(LB)教学的课程中学生表现进行了比较。所有课程均为大班授课,通常有100-200名学生。本文对经验证的概念测试数据的分析包含了来自两学期序列的代数基础和微积分基础大学物理入门课程的大量学生数据。用于评估第一和第二学期课程中学生学习的概念测试分别是力概念测试(FCI)和电磁学概念测试(CSEM)。在此讨论的研究中,特定水平的EBAE课程学生表现与LB课程在两种情况下进行了比较:(I)同一位教师教授两门课程,一门是涉及EBAE方法的翻转课程,另一门是LB课程,同时保持作业、习题课和期末考试相同;(II)将不同教师教授的所有EBAE课程的学生表现取平均值,并与同样取不同教师平均值的同类型LB课程进行比较。在所有情况下,我们发现,尽管在教学前的预测中不存在统计学上的显著差异,但显著使用主动参与策略的课程中的学生,在概念测试上的平均表现优于同类型中主要使用基于讲授教学的学生。我们还讨论了经验证的概念测试表现与期末考试之间的相关性,后者通常侧重于定量问题求解。

英文摘要:

We describe the impact of physics education research-based pedagogical techniques in flipped and active-engagement non-flipped courses on student performance on validated conceptual surveys. We compare student performance in courses which make significant use of evidence-based active engagement (EBAE) strategies with courses that primarily use lecture-based (LB) instruction. All courses had large enrollment and often had 100-200 students. The analysis of data for validated conceptual surveys presented here includes data from large numbers of students from two-semester sequences of introductory algebra-based and calculus-based introductory physics courses. The conceptual surveys used to assess student learning in the first and second semester courses were the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism, respectively. In the research discussed here, the performance of students in EBAE courses at a particular level is compared with LB courses in two situations: (I) the same instructor taught two courses, one of which was a flipped course involving EBAE methods and the other an LB course, while the homework, recitations and final exams were kept the same, (II) student performance in all of the EBAE courses taught by different instructors were averaged and compared with LB courses of the same type also averaged over different instructors. In all cases, we find that students in courses which make significant use of active-engagement strategies, on average, outperformed students in courses using primarily lecture-based instruction of the same type on conceptual surveys even though there was no statistically significant difference on the pretest before instruction. We also discuss correlation between the performance on the validated conceptual surveys and the final exam, which typically placed a heavy weight on quantitative problem solving.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑