arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1603.00516physics.ed-ph
收藏

《物理导论》教学方法的再分析--一项50 k名学生的研究

Secondary Analysis of Teaching Methods in Introductory Physics: a 50k-Student Study

Joshua Von Korff, Benjamin Archibeque, K. Alison Gomez, Tyrel Heckendorf, Sarah B. McKagan, Eleanor C. Sayre, Edward W. Schenk, Chase Shepherd, Lane Sorell

摘要:

物理教育研究者已经开发了许多基于证据的教学策略来促进物理学生的概念学习。这些策略历来都是使用诸如力量概念量表(FCI)和力量和运动概念评估(FMCE)等评估进行测试的。我们对1995年至2014年期间发表的FCI和FMCE数据进行了审查和分析。我们证实了先前的研究结果,即互动参与教学技术比传统的基于讲座的教学更有可能产生高的学生学习收益。我们还建立了互动参与教学工程在许多环境中,包括学生的高和低水平的先验知识,文科和研究型大学,以及小班和大班。

英文摘要:

Physics education researchers have developed many evidence-based instructional strategies to enhance physics students' conceptual learning. These strategies have historically been tested using assessments such as the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE). We have performed a review and analysis of FCI and FMCE data published between 1995 and 2014. We confirm previous findings that interactive engagement teaching techniques are significantly more likely to produce high student learning gains than traditional lecture-based instruction. We also establish that interactive engagement instruction works in many settings, including for students with a high and low level of prior knowledge, for liberal arts and research universities, and for small and large class sizes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑