arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1002.2664astro-ph.CO
收藏

统计学揭示了黑洞与膨胀质量相关性和共同进化的什么?

What Do Statistics Reveal About the Black Hole versus the Bulge Mass Correlation and Co-evolution?

Chien Y. Peng

摘要:

观测数据表明,超大质量黑洞(MBH)和星系核球(Mbulge)质量之间的相关性遵循近似线性的趋势,并且与核球而不是恒星总质量(Mgal)的相关性最强。随着红移的增加,当MBH >~ 10^{8.5} Msol时,相对于z=0的Gamma=MBH/Mbulge比值似乎也更大。这项研究更密切地关注统计数据,以更好地理解MBH-Mbulge相关性的创建和观察。有可能表明,如果星系合并统计数据可以驱动相关性,那么较小的合并会导致“线性收敛”,在高质量时最为明显,而较大的合并则具有中心极限收敛,更强烈地“减少了分散”。这种统计推理对星系形态是不可知的。因此,将统计预测(更多的主要合并==>更紧密的相关性)与观察(凸起=最紧密的相关性)相结合,将导致人们得出结论,更多的主要合并(贯穿整个合并树,而不仅仅是主要分支)会产生更突出的凸起。关于有争议的发现,伽玛增加红移,这项研究表明,为什么光度函数(LF)偏置参数,采取正确的面值,加强而不是削弱的结果。然而,校正LF偏差是没有必要的,因为类星体的BH质量标度是自举到z=0的正常星系中的MBH-Sigma* 相关性,并且类星体-类星体的比较是内部一致的。在蒙特卡罗模拟中,高伽马天体是“欠合并”的星系,通过较小的合并需要更长的时间才能收敛到线性。另一个证明星系在z >~ 2时质量不足的证据是类星体宿主对于它们的预期质量来说非常紧凑。

英文摘要:

Observational data show that the correlation between supermassive black holes (MBH) and galaxy bulge (Mbulge) masses follows a nearly linear trend, and that the correlation is strongest with the bulge rather than the total stellar mass (Mgal). With increasing redshift, the ratio Gamma=MBH/Mbulge relative to z=0 also seems to be larger for MBH >~ 10^{8.5} Msol. This study looks more closely at statistics to better understand the creation and observations of the MBH-Mbulge correlation. It is possible to show that if galaxy merging statistics can drive the correlation, minor mergers are responsible for causing a *convergence to linearity* most evident at high masses, whereas major mergers have a central limit convergence that more strongly *reduces the scatter*. This statistical reasoning is agnostic about galaxy morphology. Therefore, combining statistical prediction (more major mergers ==> tighter correlation) with observations (bulges = tightest correlation), would lead one to conclude that more major mergers (throughout an entire merger tree, not just the primary branch) give rise to more prominent bulges. With regard to controversial findings that Gamma increases with redshift, this study shows why the luminosity function (LF) bias argument, taken correctly at face value, strengthens rather than weakens the results. However, correcting for LF bias is unwarranted because the BH mass scale for quasars is bootstrapped to the MBH-Sigma* correlation in normal galaxies at z=0, and quasar-quasar comparisons are internally consistent. In Monte-Carlo simulations, high Gamma objects are "under-merged" galaxies that take longer to converge to linearity via minor mergers. Another evidence that the galaxies are undermassive at z >~ 2 for their MBH is that the quasar hosts are very compact for their expected mass.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑