arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0903.0149physics.soc-ph
收藏

跨文化行人基本示意图的比较

Comparison of Pedestrian Fundamental Diagram Across Cultures

Ujjal Chattaraj, Armin Seyfried, Partha Chakroborty

摘要:

速度和密度之间的关系与行人动力学的每一个自组织现象有关,并提供了定量分析它们的机会。但即使是最简单的系统,如走廊中的行人流,这种基本关系也没有完全理解。指南和教科书中对这一特征的说明存在很大差异,反映了文献中记录的矛盾数据库和有争议的讨论。在这方面的贡献,它是研究是否文化的影响和走廊的长度可以是这些偏差的原因。为了尽可能减少无意的影响,选择了一个自由度降低的系统,因此是最简单的系统,即行人在封闭边界条件下沿着一条线的运动。据发现,印度测试人员的速度是较少依赖于密度比德国测试人员的速度。令人惊讶的是,印度人的无序行为比德国人的有序行为更有效。如果没有任何统计措施,就无法得出是否存在差异的结论。通过假设检验,定量地发现这些差异是存在的,这表明行人的基本图的文化差异。

英文摘要:

The relation between speed and density is connected with every self-organization phenomenon of pedestrian dynamics and offers the opportunity to analyze them quantitatively. But even for the simplest systems, like pedestrian streams in corridors, this fundamental relation isn't completely understood. Specifications of this characteristic in guidelines and text books differ considerably reflecting the contradictory database and the controversial discussion documented in the literature. In this contribution it is studied whether cultural influences and length of the corridor can be the causes for these deviations. To reduce as much as possible unintentioned effects, a system is chosen with reduced degrees of freedom and thus the most simple system, namely the movement of pedestrians along a line under closed boundary conditions. It is found that the speed of Indian test persons is less dependent on density than the speed of German test persons. Surprisingly the more unordered behaviour of the Indians is more effective than the ordered behaviour of the Germans. Without any statistical measure one cannot conclude about whether there are differences or not. By hypothesis test it is found quantitatively that these differences exist, suggesting cultural differences in the fundamental diagram of pedestrians.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑