Reply to the "Comment on: Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance' "
英文摘要：
This is the reply to the comment arXiv:0810.4452 by Kofler, Ursin, Brukner, and Zeilinger.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
相关论文
Comment on: Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance'
In a recent experiment, Salart et al. addressed the important issues of the speed of hypothetical communication and of reference frames in Bell-type experiments. The authors report that they "performed a Bell experiment using entangled photons" and conclude from their experimental results that "to maintain an explanation based on spooky action at a distance we would have to assume that the spooky action propagates at speeds even greater than the bounds obtained in our experiment", exceeding the speed of light by orders of magnitude. Here we show that, analyzing the experimental procedure, expl…
quant-ph
评论：在桌面实验中检验超距幽灵作用的速度。[Sci Rep 13, 8201 (2023)]
Comment on: Testing the speed of the spooky action at a distance in a tabletop experiment. [Sci Rep 13, 8201 (2023)]
本文评论一项检验纠缠超光速传播的东西向桌面实验，指出其对长距离实验的多数批评并不适用于获得最高速度下界的长距离隧道实验。
quant-ph
Sonoluminescence as Quantum Vacuum Radiation, Reply to Comments
Reply to Comments by Lambrecht, Jaekel, and Reynaud, and by Garcia and Levanyuk, submitted to Physical Review Letters.
quant-ph
Reply to Yang et al.'s comment
This is to reply to a recent comment by Yang, Yuan and Zhang on ``Teleportation of two-quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resorces''.
quant-ph
Reply to Brankov et al.'s "Comment on equivalence between quantum phase transition phenomena in radiation-matter and magnetic systems"
Reply to Comment quant-ph/0506207 by J.G.Brankov et al.
quant-ph
Reply to Comment: Quantum Cryptography Based on Orthogonal States?
This is our Reply to Peres' Comment [quant-ph/9509003] to "Quantum Cryptography Based on Orthogonal States" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1239 (1995)].
quant-ph
更多相关论文收起更多论文
Reply to Comment on 'Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips'
This is a reply to the Comment on 'Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips' [arXiv:quant-ph/0610095 (2006)].
quant-ph
Reply to Cereceda's comment on "Quantum nonlocality for a three-particle nonmaximally entangled state without inequaltiy"
This is to reply to Cereceda's comment on "Quantum nonlocality for a three-particle nonmaximally entangled state without inequaltiy"
quant-ph
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"
In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.
quant-ph
Reply to the comment in quant-ph/0609028 on "controlled teleportation"
This is to reply to the comment of Kenigsberg and Mor on our previous work ``Efficient many-party controlled teleportation of multi-qubit quantum information via entanglement''[Phys. Rev. A 70, 022329 (2004)].
quant-ph
Reply to ``Comment on ``Some implications of the quantum nature of laser fields for quantum computations'' ''
We point out several superficialities in Itano's comment (quant-ph/0211165).
quant-ph
Reply to: Comment on "Quantum Optimization for Combinatorial Searches"
This is my reply to Zalka and Brun's criticism of my recent paper on quantum optimization heuristics. Essentially, this criticism is shown to be utterly irrelevant.
quant-ph
Reply to ``Comment on ``Lateral Casimir Force beyond the Proximity Force Approximation'' ''
We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]
quant-ph
Reply to the comment on "Stochastic local operations and classical communication invariant and the residual entanglement for n qubits"
We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.
quant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Non Hermitian Quantum Mechanics with Minimal Length Uncertainty", arXiv:0908.2341
It is shown that the results of ref [1] are consistent.
quant-ph
Reply to "Comment on: A Quantum Approach to Static Games of Complete Information"
This is a reply to the paper by S.C.Benjamin, quant-ph/0008127.
quant-ph
Reply to "Comment on `Gleason-type theorem including qubits and projective measurements: the Born rule beyond quantum physics' ", by Michael J. W. Hall
We present a reply to the objections raised by M. J. W. Hall against our extension of Gleason's theorem.
quant-ph
Comments on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'and 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'
This paper includes two comments. The first one is a comment on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'. Two different efficient methods are presented to modify some details of N. Ba An's protocol, so that teleportation of two quNit entanglement can be successfully achieved in terms of the revised N. Ba An's protocol. The second one is a comment on 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'.
quant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Quantum dense key distribution"
In this Reply we propose a modified security proof of the Quantum Dense Key Distribution protocol detecting also the eavesdropping attack proposed by Wojcik in his Comment.
quant-ph
Reply to 'comment on Berry phase in a composite system'
In this reply, we show that the adiabatic theorem would break down in the weak coupling limit, and the definition for the subsystem geometric phase is well defined.
quant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Non-monotonicity in the Quantum-Classical Transition: Chaos Induced by Quantum Effects"
Response to comment by Finn et al.
quant-ph
Reply to Comment on ``Generating Functions for Hermite Polynomials of Arbitrary Order"
The results in the preceding comment are placed on a more general mathematical foundation.
quant-ph
Reply To "Comment on 'Quantum Convolutional Error-Correcting Codes' "
In their comment, de Almedia and Palazzo \cite{comment} discovered an error in my earlier paper concerning the construction of quantum convolutional codes (quant-ph/9712029). This error can be repaired by modifying the method of code construction.
quant-ph
Reply to the Comment on `Deterministic Single-Photon Source for Distributed Quantum Networking'
Reply to the comment of H. J. Kimble [quant-ph/0210032] on the experiment realizing a "deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking" by Kuhn, Hennrich, and Rempe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 067901 (2002), quant-ph/0204147].
quant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Contextuality in bosonic bunching"
This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].
quant-ph
Reply to comment on "Interaction of a BEC with a gravitational wave"
This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. Rätzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]
gr-qcquant-ph
Reply to Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States"
We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).
cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
Reply to "Comment on `Resilience of gated avalanche photodiodes against bright illumination attacks in quantum cryptography'"
This is a Reply to the Comment by Lydersen et al. [arXiv: 1106.3756v1].
physics.ins-detquant-ph
Reply to "Comment on "Fully covariant radiation force on a polarizable particle""
We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)
cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Anomalous Edge State in a Non-Hermitian Lattice"
The Comment by Xiong et al. (arXiv:1610.06275) criticizing my Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016)] was rejected by Physical Review Letters. In this Reply, I show that all their claims are wrong.
cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED"
A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].
cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
Reply to comment on Casimir energy for spherical boundaries
It is shown that the recent criticism of Brevik et al. (hep-th/0004041) is in error.
hep-thquant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Completely positive quantum dissipation"
This is the reply to a Comment by R. F. O'Connell (Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 028901) on a paper written by the author (B. Vacchini, ``Completely positive quantum dissipation'', Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000) 1374, arXiv:quant-ph/0002094).
cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
Reply to Comment on "Space-Time Crystals of Trapped Ions"
This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).
cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phquant-ph
Reply to Comment on: Hawking radiation from ultrashort laser pulse filaments
A comment by R. Schutzhold et al. raises possible concerns and questions regarding recent measurements of analogue Hawking radiation. We briefly reply to the opinions expressed in the comment and sustain that the origin of the radiation may be understood in terms of Hawking emission.
gr-qcphysics.opticsquant-ph
Reply to "Comment on 'Universality of Quantum Gravity Corrections' "
We address the three points raised by the authors of the above Comment.
gr-qchep-phhep-th
Reply to "Comment on `Dark pulse emission of a fiber laser'"
We reply to S. Coen and T. Sylvestre's comment on our paper [Phys. Rev. A 80, 045803 (2009)] and make some additional remarks on our experimental results.
nlin.CDnlin.PSphysics.optics
