Reply to 'comment on Berry phase in a composite system'
X. X. Yi, L. C. Wang, T. Y. Zheng
在这个回答中，我们表明，绝热定理将打破弱耦合限制，和子系统的几何相位的定义是很好的定义。
In this reply, we show that the adiabatic theorem would break down in the weak coupling limit, and the definition for the subsystem geometric phase is well defined.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
Sonoluminescence as Quantum Vacuum Radiation, Reply to Comments
对Lambrecht、Jaekel和Lambrechaud以及Garcia和Levanyuk提交给《物理评论快报》的评论的答复。
Reply to Yang et al.'s comment
这是对杨、袁、张三人最近发表的评论《两人纠缠的传送：开发当地资源》的答复。
Reply to Brankov et al.'s "Comment on equivalence between quantum phase transition phenomena in radiation-matter and magnetic systems"
回复J.G.Brankov等人的评论quant-ph/0506207。
Reply to the "Comment on: Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance' "
这是对Kofler、Ursin、Brukner和Zeilinger的评论arXiv：0810.4452的回复。
Reply to Comment: Quantum Cryptography Based on Orthogonal States?
这是我们对Peres的评论[quant-ph/9509003]的回复，“基于正交态的量子密码学”[Phys. Rev. Lett. 75，1239（1995）]。
Reply to Comment on 'Spin Decoherence in Superconducting Atom Chips'
这是对“超导原子芯片中的自旋退相干”评论的回复[arXiv：quant-ph/0610095（2006）]。
Reply to Cereceda's comment on "Quantum nonlocality for a three-particle nonmaximally entangled state without inequaltiy"
这是对Cereceda关于“三粒子非最大纠缠态的量子非定域性”一文的答复
Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"
在评论中，Zanardi和Rasetti认为我们最近的信中的几个主张（Phys. Rev. Lett. 1953年，1997年，他被质疑。答复表明这些说法仍然属实。
Reply to the comment in quant-ph/0609028 on "controlled teleportation"
这是对Kenigsberg和Mor对我们以前工作“通过纠缠实现多量子位量子信息的有效多方控制隐形传态”[Phys.Rev.A70，022329（2004）]的评论的回应。
Reply to ``Comment on ``Some implications of the quantum nature of laser fields for quantum computations'' ''
我们指出Itano评论中的几个肤浅之处（quant-ph/0211165）。
Reply to: Comment on "Quantum Optimization for Combinatorial Searches"
这是我对Zalka和Brun对我最近关于量子优化算法的论文的批评的回复。从本质上讲，这种批评被证明是完全无关紧要的。
Reply to ``Comment on ``Lateral Casimir Force beyond the Proximity Force Approximation'' ''
我们回复我们的信件arXiv：quant-ph/0603120上的评论arXiv：quant-ph/0702060 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100402（2006）]
Reply to the comment on "Stochastic local operations and classical communication invariant and the residual entanglement for n qubits"
我们已经审查了[3]中的评论，发布在arXiv.org上，关于我们最近在[1]中的工作。我们在本文中对这一评论作出了回应。
It is shown that the results of ref [1] are consistent.
Reply to "Comment on: A Quantum Approach to Static Games of Complete Information"
这是对S.C.Benjamin的论文quant-ph/0008127的回复。
We present a reply to the objections raised by M. J. W. Hall against our extension of Gleason's theorem.
Comments on 'Teleportation of two quNit entanglement: Exploiting local resources'and 'Reply to Yang et al.'s comment'
本文包括两个评论。第一个是对“两量子纠缠的传送：利用本地资源”的评论。提出了两种不同的有效方法来修改N. Ba An的方案，从而在修正的N.巴安的方案。第二篇是对《回复杨等人》的评论。”的评论。
Reply to Comment on "Quantum dense key distribution"
在这个回复中，我们提出了一个修改的量子密集密钥分发协议的安全性证明，也检测到Wojcik在他的评论中提出的窃听攻击。
Reply to Comment on "Non-monotonicity in the Quantum-Classical Transition: Chaos Induced by Quantum Effects"
对Finn等人评论的回应
Reply to Comment on ``Generating Functions for Hermite Polynomials of Arbitrary Order"
前面的评论中的结果是建立在更一般的数学基础上的。
Reply To "Comment on 'Quantum Convolutional Error-Correcting Codes' "
在他们的评论中，de Almedia和Palazzo \cite{comment}发现了我早期关于量子卷积码构造的论文（quant-ph/9712029）中的一个错误。此错误可以通过修改代码构造方法来修复。
Reply to the Comment on `Deterministic Single-Photon Source for Distributed Quantum Networking'
回复H的评论。J. Kimble [quant-ph/0210032]关于Kuhn、Hennrich和Rempe实现“用于分布式量子网络的确定性单光子源”的实验[Phys. Rev. Lett. 89，067901（2002），quant-ph/0204147]。
This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].
This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. Rätzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]
We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).
This is a Reply to the Comment by Lydersen et al. [arXiv: 1106.3756v1].
We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)
The Comment by Xiong et al. (arXiv:1610.06275) criticizing my Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016)] was rejected by Physical Review Letters. In this Reply, I show that all their claims are wrong.
A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].
Reply to comment on Casimir energy for spherical boundaries
本文指出，最近对Brevik等人（hep-th/0004041）的批评是错误的。
Reply to Comment on "Completely positive quantum dissipation"
这是对R评论的回复。F. O'Connell（Phys. Rev. Lett. 87（2001）028901）对作者（B. Vacchini，“完全正量子耗散”，Phys.Rev.Lett. 84（2000）1374，arXiv：quant-ph/0002094）。
This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).
A comment by R. Schutzhold et al. raises possible concerns and questions regarding recent measurements of analogue Hawking radiation. We briefly reply to the opinions expressed in the comment and sustain that the origin of the radiation may be understood in terms of Hawking emission.
We address the three points raised by the authors of the above Comment.
We reply to S. Coen and T. Sylvestre's comment on our paper [Phys. Rev. A 80, 045803 (2009)] and make some additional remarks on our experimental results.
扫码添加微信好友，提出您的宝贵建议 👇
💡 备注请填写：网站反馈
发表机构由 AI 从论文文本抽取，如发现错误，欢迎反馈修正建议。