arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0810.4238math.STstat.TH
收藏

分位数的平滑加权经验似然比置信区间

Smoothed weighted empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for quantiles

Jian-Jian Ren

摘要:

到目前为止,基于似然的区间估计的分位数还没有研究在文献中的区间删失情况2数据和部分区间删失数据,在这种情况下,使用平滑没有被认为是任何类型的删失数据。本文在统一的框架下,针对不同类型的删失数据,包括右删失数据、双删失数据、区间删失数据和部分区间删失数据,构造了分位数的平滑加权经验似然比置信区间(WELRCI)。推导了加权经验对数似然比的四阶展开式,建立了WELRCI的理论覆盖精度方程,该方程一般保证至少一阶精度。特别是,对于右删失数据,我们表明,覆盖精度至少是$O(n^{-1/2})$和我们的模拟研究表明,与经验似然为基础的方法相比,在WELRCI中使用的平滑一般提供了一个较短的置信区间具有可比的覆盖精度。对于区间删失数据,有趣的是发现在调整率$n^{-1/3}$下,加权经验对数似然比的渐近分布完全不同于经验似然法所得的渐近分布,并且所得的WELRCI在现有的比较模拟研究中表现良好.

英文摘要:

Thus far, likelihood-based interval estimates for quantiles have not been studied in the literature on interval censored case 2 data and partly interval censored data, and, in this context, the use of smoothing has not been considered for any type of censored data. This article constructs smoothed weighted empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals (WELRCI) for quantiles in a unified framework for various types of censored data, including right censored data, doubly censored data, interval censored data and partly interval censored data. The fourth order expansion of the weighted empirical log-likelihood ratio is derived and the theoretical coverage accuracy equation for the proposed WELRCI is established, which generally guarantees at least `first order' accuracy. In particular, for right censored data, we show that the coverage accuracy is at least $O(n^{-1/2})$ and our simulation studies show that in comparison with empirical likelihood-based methods, the smoothing used in WELRCI generally provides a shorter confidence interval with comparable coverage accuracy. For interval censored data, it is interesting to find that with an adjusted rate $n^{-1/3}$, the weighted empirical log-likelihood ratio has an asymptotic distribution completely different from that obtained by the empirical likelihood approach and the resulting WELRCI perform favorably in the available comparison simulation studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑