arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0809.0537gr-qc
收藏

宇宙学哈勃与超新星数据吻合

Cosmographic Hubble fits to the supernova data

Celine Cattoen, Matt Visser

摘要:

距离和红移之间的哈勃关系是一个纯粹的宇宙学关系,它只依赖于FLRW时空的对称性,但本质上并不做任何动力学假设。这表明,在不做任何动力学假设的情况下,估计定义哈勃关系的参数应该是可能的。为了验证这个想法,我们对legacy 05和gold 06超新星数据集进行了一些相互关联的宇宙学拟合。基于这些超新星数据,“优势证据”无疑表明宇宙在加速膨胀。然而,我们认为(除非使用额外的动力学和观测信息),这一结论目前还没有得到“毫无疑问”的支持。作为分析的一部分,我们开发了两个特别透明的红移距离关系的图形表示-表示,其中加速度与减速度减少到相关的图形是否向上或向下倾斜的问题。关于宇宙学拟合的细节,我们特别关注三个问题:首先,减速参数的拟合值会发生显著变化,这取决于是否对光度距离、自行距离或其他合适的距离替代物进行卡方拟合。其次,减速参数的拟合值会发生显著变化,这取决于是否使用传统的红移变量z,或者我们将在理论上论证的是改进的参数化y=z/(1+z)。第三,公布的系统不确定性估计值足够大,它们肯定会影响,并在很大程度上破坏,通常的纯统计检验的意义。我们的结论是,超新星的数据应该谨慎对待。

英文摘要:

The Hubble relation between distance and redshift is a purely cosmographic relation that depends only on the symmetries of a FLRW spacetime, but does not intrinsically make any dynamical assumptions. This suggests that it should be possible to estimate the parameters defining the Hubble relation without making any dynamical assumptions. To test this idea, we perform a number of inter-related cosmographic fits to the legacy05 and gold06 supernova datasets. Based on this supernova data, the "preponderance of evidence" certainly suggests an accelerating universe. However we would argue that (unless one uses additional dynamical and observational information) this conclusion is not currently supported "beyond reasonable doubt". As part of the analysis we develop two particularly transparent graphical representations of the redshift-distance relation -- representations in which acceleration versus deceleration reduces to the question of whether the relevant graph slopes up or down. Turning to the details of the cosmographic fits, three issues in particular concern us: First, the fitted value for the deceleration parameter changes significantly depending on whether one performs a chi^2 fit to the luminosity distance, proper motion distance or other suitable distance surrogate. Second, the fitted value for the deceleration parameter changes significantly depending on whether one uses the traditional redshift variable z, or what we shall argue is on theoretical grounds an improved parameterization y=z/(1+z). Third, the published estimates for systematic uncertainties are sufficiently large that they certainly impact on, and to a large extent undermine, the usual purely statistical tests of significance. We conclude that the supernova data should be treated with some caution.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑