arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0807.2565math.NAcs.NA

关于多重网格方法中网格转移算子的注记

A note on grid transfer operators for multigrid methods

Università dell’Insubria(因斯布鲁克大学)

Marco Donatelli

AI总结:

本文证明了椭圆偏微分方程中基于局部傅里叶分析的最优性条件与Toeplitz矩阵多重网格方法中基于符号零点阶数的条件等价,并提出了与B样条细化方程相关的网格转移算子类。

摘要:

局部傅里叶分析(LFA)是证明多重网格方法(MGM)收敛定理的经典工具。特别地,我们关注最优性,即收敛速度与所涉及矩阵的大小无关。对于椭圆偏微分方程(PDE),一个众所周知的最优性结果要求网格转移算子的阶数之和不低于待解PDE的阶数。类似地,在处理Toeplitz矩阵的MGM时,文献中已发现关于网格转移算子符号的零点位置和阶数的最优性条件。本文表明,在常系数椭圆PDE的情况下,这两种不同的方法导致等价的条件。我们认为,Toeplitz矩阵的分析是LFA的代数推广,它不仅适用于微分问题,也适用于例如积分问题。两种方法的等价性使得对于Toeplitz矩阵的MGM也可以使用不同阶数的网格转移算子。我们还给出了与B样条细化方程相关的一类网格转移算子,并研究了它们的几何性质。该分析揭示了小波与多重网格方法之间的进一步联系。数值实验证实了所提出分析的正确性。

英文摘要:

The Local Fourier analysis (LFA) is a classic tool to prove convergence theorems for multigrid methods (MGMs). In particular, we are interested in optimality that is a convergence speed independent of the size of the involved matrices. For elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs), a well known optimality result requires that the sum of the orders of the grid transfer operators is not lower than the order of the PDE to solve. Analogously, when dealing with MGMs for Toeplitz matrices in the literature an optimality condition on the position and on the order of the zeros of the symbols of the grid transfer operators has been found. In this work we show that in the case of elliptic PDEs with constant coefficients, the two different approaches lead to an equivalent condition. We argue that the analysis for Toeplitz matrices is an algebraic generalization of the LFA, which allows to deal not only with differential problems but also for instance with integral problems. The equivalence of the two approaches gives the possibility of using grid transfer operators with different orders also for MGMs for Toeplitz matrices. We give also a class of grid transfer operators related to the B-spline's refinement equation and we study their geometric properties. This analysis suggests further links between wavelets and multigrid methods. A numerical experimentation confirms the correctness of the proposed analysis.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑