arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0807.1117hep-phhep-thnucl-th
收藏

Schwinger机制再访

The Schwinger mechanism revisited

Thomas D. Cohen, David A. McGady

摘要:

很久以前,施温格就推导出了带电费米子系统在固定的、外部的、空间均匀的电场中的真空持续概率$P_{vac}(t)$; $w = -log[P_{vac}(t)]/ (V t)$通常被认为是由于电场而产生的每单位体积的费米子-反费米子对的速率。在本文中,我们分别计算了$w$和每单位体积费米子-反费米子对产生率$Γ$的精确表达式,并表明它们不同。虽然$w$由标准Schwinger机制结果$w$给出,但一个无穷级数,对产生速率$Γ$只是该级数的第一项。我们的计算是对具有周期性边界条件的系统在$A_0=0$规范中进行的,但结果应该对任何一致的边界条件都成立。我们讨论了速率$w$和$Γ$不同的物理原因。

英文摘要:

The vacuum persistence probability, $P_{vac}(t)$, for a system of charged fermions in a fixed, external, and spatially homogeneous electric field, was derived long ago by Schwinger; $w = -log[P_{vac}(t)]/ (V t)$ has often been identified as the rate at which fermion-antifermion pairs are produced per unit volume due to the electric field. In this paper, we separately compute exact expressions for both $w$ and for the rate of fermion-antifermion pair production per unit volume, $Γ$, and show that they differ. While $w$ is given by the standard Schwinger mechanism result $w$, an infinite series, the pair production rate, $Γ$, is just the first term of that series. Our calculation is done for a system with periodic boundary conditions in the $A_0=0$ gauge but the result should hold for any consistent set of boundary conditions. We discuss, the physical reason why the rates $w$ and $Γ$ differ.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑