arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv quant-ph/9603015quant-ph
收藏

量子比特承诺的麻烦

The Trouble with Quantum Bit Commitment

Dominic Mayers

摘要:

在最近的一篇论文中,Lo和Chau解释了如何破解一系列量子比特承诺方案,他们声称他们的攻击适用于1993年的Brachard,Crépeau,Jozsa和Langlois(BCJL)协议。他们的攻击背后的直觉是正确的,事实上,他们暴露了某种类型的所有建议的共同弱点,但BCJL协议不属于这一类。尽管如此,BCJL协议确实是不安全的,但所需的攻击和证明更加微妙。在这里,我们提供了第一个完整的证明,BCJL协议是不安全的。

英文摘要:

In a recent paper, Lo and Chau explain how to break a family of quantum bit commitment schemes, and they claim that their attack applies to the 1993 protocol of Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa and Langlois (BCJL). The intuition behind their attack is correct, and indeed they expose a weakness common to all proposals of a certain kind, but the BCJL protocol does not fall in this category. Nevertheless, it is true that the BCJL protocol is insecure, but the required attack and proof are more subtle. Here we provide the first complete proof that the BCJL protocol is insecure.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑