arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv quant-ph/0206110quant-ph
收藏

量子态指派的相容性条件

Conditions for compatibility of quantum state assignments

Carlton M. Caves, Christopher A. Fuchs, Ruediger Schack

摘要:

假设N方用N个可能不同的密度算符来描述量子系统的状态。这N个状态分配代表了各方对系统的信念。我们检查的条件,以确定是否N状态分配是兼容的。我们区分两种评估兼容性的程序,第一种是基于N状态分配所基于的先验信念的兼容性,第二种是基于它们定义的预测测量概率的兼容性。第一个过程导致由Brun、Finkelstein和Mermin提出的相容性准则[BFM,Phys.Rev.A65,032315(2002)]。第二个程序导致了一个层次的测量为基础的兼容性标准,这是从根本上不同于相应的经典情况。从量子力学的角度来看,没有一个基于测量的兼容性准则等同于BFM准则。

英文摘要:

Suppose N parties describe the state of a quantum system by N possibly different density operators. These N state assignments represent the beliefs of the parties about the system. We examine conditions for determining whether the N state assignments are compatible. We distinguish two kinds of procedures for assessing compatibility, the first based on the compatibility of the prior beliefs on which the N state assignments are based and the second based on the compatibility of predictive measurement probabilities they define. The first procedure leads to a compatibility criterion proposed by Brun, Finkelstein, and Mermin [BFM, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032315 (2002)]. The second procedure leads to a hierarchy of measurement-based compatibility criteria which is fundamentally different from the corresponding classical situation. Quantum mechanically none of the measurement-based compatibility criteria is equivalent to the BFM criterion.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑