arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv quant-ph/0206046quant-ph
收藏

Bell定理证明中的逻辑推理

Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell

Karl Hess, Walter Philipp

摘要:

我们讨论了一类基于潜在结果表的Bell型不等式的证明。这些证明的本质是:如果一个人只能想象(或在表中写下)EPR实验的隐藏参数模型的潜在结果,那么与实验和量子力学的矛盾就随之而来。我们表明,这些证据不包含隐藏的变量,涉及到时间,或者,如果他们这样做,导致逻辑矛盾,使他们无效。

英文摘要:

We discuss a class of proofs of Bell-type inequalities that are based on tables of potential outcomes. These proofs state in essence: if one can only imagine (or write down in a table) the potential outcome of a hidden parameter model for EPR experiments then a contradiction to experiment and quantum mechanics follows. We show that these proofs do not contain hidden variables that relate to time or, if they do, lead to logical contradictions that render them invalid.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑