新的红移解释得到确认
The New Redshift Interpretation Affirmed
摘要：
在1997年底，我报告（现代物理学快报。A 12（1997）2919; astro-ph/9806280）哈勃关系和2.7K CBR的新红移解释（NRI）的发现，首次表明在爱因斯坦的静态时空广义相对论（GR）而不是弗里德曼-勒梅特膨胀时空范式的宇宙框架内解释这些现象是可能的。最近，Carlip和Scranton（astro-ph/9808021; C&S）声称在这一发现中发现了缺陷，同时也声称标准宇宙学是没有错误的。他们的分析假设NRI代表宇宙的静态宇宙学模型。这样不对我的MPLA报告清楚地指出，NRI包括一个膨胀的宇宙，其中星系正在经历多普勒衰退，由于真空密度排斥。C&S在这一关键点上的混乱导致了他们分析中的严重错误。其次，在声称标准宇宙学是无错误的时候，C&S没有回应我的预印本gr-qc/9806061中的矛盾证据。在那里，我首先展示了为什么宇宙是由爱因斯坦静态时空GR支配的，而不是大爆炸宇宙学所依赖的弗里德曼-勒梅特膨胀时空范式。其次，我注意到关于F-L范式的一个最令人尴尬的事实，即它总是涉及巨大的非守恒能量损失，相当于大约3000万个宇宙的质量，每个宇宙的质量为10^21个太阳。
英文摘要：
In late 1997 I reported (Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12 (1997) 2919; astro-ph/9806280) the discovery of A New Redshift Interpretation (NRI) of the Hubble relation and the 2.7K CBR, which showed for the first time that it was possible to explain these phenomena within the framework of a universe governed by Einstein's static-spacetime general relativity (GR) instead of the Friedmann-Lemaitre expanding-spacetime paradigm. More recently Carlip and Scranton (astro-ph/9808021; C&S) claim to find flaws in this discovery, while also claiming the standard cosmology is error free. Their analysis assumes the NRI represents a static cosmological model of the universe. This is wrong. My MPLA report clearly states the NRI encompasses an expanding universe wherein galaxies are undergoing Doppler recession due to vacuum density repulsion. C&S's confusion on this crucial point leads to serious errors in their analysis. Next, in claiming the standard cosmology is error free, C&S fail to respond to the contradictory evidence in my preprint, gr-qc/9806061. There I first show why the universe is governed by Einstein static-spacetime GR, and not the Friedmann-Lemaitre expanding spacetime paradigm on which Big Bang cosmology is critically hinged. Secondly, I note a most embarrassing fact about the F-L paradigm--namely, that it has always involved gargantuan nonconservation-of-energy losses amounting to the mass equivalent of about thirty million universes, each with a mass of 10^21 suns.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
