红移与能量守恒
Redshift and Energy Conservation
摘要：
把宇宙学红移看作是多普勒速度效应而不是空间膨胀的结果，一直被认为是一个严重的错误。这里证明了实际情况并非如此，并且从多普勒解释中得出的视距离-红移关系与超新星数据相当一致（尽管不如具有暗能量的标准模型）。正常的多普勒效应进行了详细的检查，并如预期的那样保存能量。由于广义相对论空间膨胀范式和多普勒效应（如图所示）之间的等价性，与宇宙膨胀相关的长期存在的能量损失问题以与正常的良好多普勒效应类似的方式处理。能量守恒与正常多普勒频移的机制被应用到宇宙学红移和能量破坏消失。然而，引入了额外的亮度相关衰退因子。对天文物体的影响进行了研究，发现只有一个小的额外的红移，以身体发电的核手段，但可以是非常大的重力供电的对象。一个可能的连接到声称的异常红移的类星体被认为是。
英文摘要：
It has always been considered a serious error to treat the cosmological redshift as a Doppler velocity effect rather than the result of space expansion. It is demonstrated here that in practical terms this is not the case, and that the apparent distance - redshift relation derived from a Doppler interpretation is reasonably consistent with supernova data (though not as good as the standard model with dark energy). The normal Doppler effect is examined in detail and shown to conserve energy as expected. Because of the equivalence between the general relativistic space expansion paradigm and the Doppler effect (as demonstrated) the long-standing problem of energy loss associated with the expansion of the Universe is treated in a similar manner to the normal well-behaved Doppler effect. The mechanism by which energy is conserved with the normal Doppler shift is applied to the cosmological redshift and the energy violation disappears. However, an additional luminosity-dependent recession factor is introduced. The effect on astronomical objects is examined and it is found to add only a small additional redshift to a body generating power by nuclear means but can be very large for objects powered by gravity. A possible connection to the claimed anomalous redshift of quasars is considered.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
