设计方案协同评估中的协商：一个并行工程过程的实证研究
Negotiation in collaborative assessment of design solutions: an empirical study on a Concurrent Engineering process
摘要：
在并行工程中，设计解决方案不仅是由特定领域的专业人员产生的。由于设计活动的团队性质，解决方案是协商的。我们的目标是分析导致这些谈判解决方案的论证过程。这些过程在会议上进行，这些会议将专家聚集在一起，共同设计目标。我们进行了认知工效学的研究工作，在定义阶段的航空设计项目，参与者在并行工程。我们记录，转录和分析了7个多专业会议。根据需要组织这些会议，以评估将每个专业的解决方案整合到全球解决方案中的情况。我们发现，有三种主要的设计方案评估模式，可以结合在这些会议：（a）分析评估模式，（b）比较评估模式，（c）类比评估模式。在这些评估模式中，使用了不同类型的参数。此外，我们发现了一个典型的时间协商过程。
英文摘要：
In Concurrent engineering, design solutions are not only produced by individuals specialized in a given field. Due to the team nature of the design activity, solutions are negotiated. Our objective is to analyse the argumentation processes leading to these negotiated solutions. These processes take place in the meetings which group together specialists with a co-design aim. We conducted cognitive ergonomics research work during the definition phase of an aeronautical design project in which the participants work in Concurrent Engineering. We recorded, retranscribed and analysed 7 multi-speciality meetings. These meetings were organised, as needed, to assess the integration of the solutions of each speciality into a global solution. We found that there are three main design proposal assessment modes which can be combined in these meetings: (a) analytical assessment mode, (b) comparative assessment mode (c) analogical assessment mode. Within these assessment modes, different types of arguments are used. Furthermore we found a typical temporal negotiation process.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
