共同选择：二元协商如何塑造认知障碍老年人及其照护伙伴的适应性厨房设计偏好
Choosing Together: How Dyadic Negotiation Shapes Adaptive Kitchen Design Preferences for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment and Their Care Partners
- Georgia Institute of Technology（佐治亚理工学院）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
AI总结：
本研究通过协同设计工作坊和互动分析，揭示认知障碍老年人及其照护伙伴的厨房设计偏好经由家庭协商共同塑造，而非单纯个体属性，并提出支持共同决策的设计启示。
AI中文摘要：
针对认知障碍老年人的适应性技术通常围绕个人偏好进行设计，然而这一人群中的大多数与配偶或家庭成员共同生活并一起做饭。本文考察了一个协同设计工作坊，其中四组二元组合和两名个体（共10人）从五个特征的二十一个选项中构建了厨房橱柜设计。对三十个选择进行的主题分析识别出反复出现的模式：通过封闭式而非开放式搁架保持视觉可达性，体力付出被视为家庭共同关注的问题，以及自动化在可预测时被接受。对十个互动片段的结构化分析展示了某些模式如何在实践中被协商，包括照护伙伴贡献出与主要参与者不同的具身约束，以及分歧通过记录在案的审议得到解决。综合来看，这两项分析表明，适应性技术偏好并非总是个体属性，而可能通过家庭互动得以塑造。我们为促进协议和协作系统提出候选设计启示，以支持居家养老情境中的共同决策。
英文摘要：
Adaptive technology for older adults with cognitive impairment is typically designed around individual preference, yet most of this population lives and cooks with a spouse or family member. This paper examines a co-design workshop in which four dyads and two individuals (N=10) built kitchen cabinet designs from twenty-one options across five features. Thematic analysis of thirty selections identifies recurring patterns: visual access retained through enclosure rather than open shelving, physical effort treated as a household concern, and automation accepted when predictable. Structured analysis of ten interaction episodes shows how some patterns were negotiated in practice, including care partners contributing embodied constraints distinct from the primary participant, and disagreements resolving through documented deliberation. Together, the two analyses show that adaptive technology preferences are not always individual properties but can be shaped through household interaction. We offer candidate design implications for facilitation protocols and collaborative systems supporting shared decision-making in aging-in-place contexts.
