arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv cs/0701116cs.ITmath.IT
收藏

CSI和功率分配对中继信道容量的影响及协作策略

The Impact of CSI and Power Allocation on Relay Channel Capacity and Cooperation Strategies

Chris T. K. Ng, Andrea J. Goldsmith

摘要:

在中继网络中,合作的节点是靠近在一起的发射机和接收机合作的容量增益进行比较。准静态相位衰落下,当所有节点具有相等的平均发射功率以及完整的信道状态信息(CSI),它表明,发射机合作优于接收机合作,而相反的是真实的,当功率最优分配的合作节点之间,但只有CSI在接收机(CSIR)是可用的。当节点具有相同的功率与CSIR只,合作方案被证明提供没有能力的改善,在相同的网络功率约束下的非合作。当系统处于最优功率分配下,信道状态信息完整时,解码转发发送协作速率接近其割集容量上界,优于压缩转发接收协作。在高SNR区域中的快速瑞利衰落下,得出类似的结论。合作系统提供弹性衰落信道幅度,然而,容量变得更敏感的功率分配,和合作节点需要更紧密地在一起的解码和转发方案是容量实现。此外,为了实现容量的提高,完整的CSI是必要的发射机合作,而在接收机合作的最佳功率分配是必不可少的。

英文摘要:

Capacity gains from transmitter and receiver cooperation are compared in a relay network where the cooperating nodes are close together. Under quasi-static phase fading, when all nodes have equal average transmit power along with full channel state information (CSI), it is shown that transmitter cooperation outperforms receiver cooperation, whereas the opposite is true when power is optimally allocated among the cooperating nodes but only CSI at the receiver (CSIR) is available. When the nodes have equal power with CSIR only, cooperative schemes are shown to offer no capacity improvement over non-cooperation under the same network power constraint. When the system is under optimal power allocation with full CSI, the decode-and-forward transmitter cooperation rate is close to its cut-set capacity upper bound, and outperforms compress-and-forward receiver cooperation. Under fast Rayleigh fading in the high SNR regime, similar conclusions follow. Cooperative systems provide resilience to fading in channel magnitudes; however, capacity becomes more sensitive to power allocation, and the cooperating nodes need to be closer together for the decode-and-forward scheme to be capacity-achieving. Moreover, to realize capacity improvement, full CSI is necessary in transmitter cooperation, while in receiver cooperation optimal power allocation is essential.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑