arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv cs/0208036cs.CL
收藏

参考分辨率的三种新评价方法

Three New Methods for Evaluating Reference Resolution

Andrei Popescu-Belis, Isabelle Robba

摘要:

无法手动评估扩展文本(数千个引用)的引用分辨率。一个评价算法已被提出的MUC测试,使用等价类的共指关系。然而,我们在这里表明,这种算法是过于放纵,即使是穷人的决议战略产生良好的成绩。我们阐述了同样的形式主义,提出了两个新的评价算法,比较他们首先与MUC算法,然后在各种例子的结果。第三个算法只使用分布比较等价类的最后描述,它评估的召回率与精度错误的相对重要性。

英文摘要:

Reference resolution on extended texts (several thousand references) cannot be evaluated manually. An evaluation algorithm has been proposed for the MUC tests, using equivalence classes for the coreference relation. However, we show here that this algorithm is too indulgent, yielding good scores even for poor resolution strategies. We elaborate on the same formalism to propose two new evaluation algorithms, comparing them first with the MUC algorithm and giving then results on a variety of examples. A third algorithm using only distributional comparison of equivalence classes is finally described; it assesses the relative importance of the recall vs. precision errors.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑