arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2606.17048cs.LGcs.CVstat.ML

精确后验分数估计用于求解线性逆问题

Exact Posterior Score Estimation for Solving Linear Inverse Problems

University of Oxford(牛津大学);UIUC(伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校);EverEx

Abbas Mammadov, Ozgur Kara, Kaan Oktay, Iskander Azangulov, Adil Kaan Akan, Hyungjin Chung, James Matthew Rehg, Yee Whye Teh

AI总结:

提出精确后验分数(EPS)方法,通过闭式后验分数将线性逆问题转化为去噪问题,无需梯度或投影,在FFHQ和ImageNet上优于现有方法。

摘要:

扩散和基于流的模型通过训练去噪器来逆转高斯损坏,从而学习强大的数据先验。为了利用这一先验解决线性逆问题,需要从后验中采样,但先验提供的分数是无条件分数,而非后验分数。现有方法要么使用近似测量匹配校正来引导固定的预训练去噪器,要么训练一个放弃先验去噪结构的条件恢复模型。我们在一般高斯插值下推导了线性高斯逆问题的精确后验分数闭式,并表明后验采样可归结为在算子依赖的偏移枢轴和各向异性噪声协方差下的去噪问题。我们将这一恒等式转化为精确后验分数(EPS),这是一种去噪训练目标,保留了标准预训练的输入/输出结构,因此可以从头训练或从预训练去噪器微调。在推理时,EPS使用与底层骨干相同的采样器,无需似然梯度或投影。我们在FFHQ和ImageNet上的五个线性逆问题上评估了EPS,在保真度、感知和分布指标上优于无训练和基于训练的基线,同时使用的去噪器评估次数比基于梯度的后验采样器少大约一个数量级。

英文摘要:

Diffusion and flow-based models learn powerful data priors by training a denoiser to reverse Gaussian corruption. To use this prior to solve a linear inverse problem, one needs to sample from the posterior, but the score that the prior provides is the unconditional score, not the posterior score. Existing methods either steer a fixed pretrained denoiser with approximate measurement-matching corrections, or train a conditional restoration model that abandons the denoising structure of the prior. We derive the exact posterior score in closed form for linear Gaussian inverse problems under general Gaussian interpolants, and show that posterior sampling reduces to a denoising problem at an operator-dependent shifted pivot under an anisotropic noise covariance. We turn this identity into Exact Posterior Score (EPS), a denoising training objective that preserves the input/output structure of standard pretraining and can therefore be trained from scratch or fine-tuned from a pretrained denoiser. At inference, EPS uses the same sampler as the underlying backbone, with no likelihood gradients or projections. We evaluate EPS on five linear inverse problems across FFHQ and ImageNet, where it outperforms training-free and training-based baselines on fidelity, perceptual, and distributional metrics, while using roughly an order of magnitude fewer denoiser evaluations than gradient-based posterior samplers.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑