arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2606.08758quant-ph
收藏

神经网络解码器置信度作为逻辑间隙的学习代理

Neural network decoder confidence as a learned proxy for the logical gap

David Dentelski

AI总结:

研究利用图神经网络解码器的logit作为逻辑间隙的代理,通过后选择降低逻辑错误率,并发现其置信度更接近理想值。

摘要:

为了利用量子纠错码,解码器必须从测量的综合征中推断逻辑扇区。除了产生硬逻辑决策外,一些解码器还提供估计该决策可靠性的软信息。对于最小权重完美匹配(MWPM),一种常见的置信度度量是互补间隙或逻辑间隙。这里我们测试图神经网络(GNN)解码器的logit是否可以作为逻辑间隙的学习代理。使用在均匀电路级噪声下旋转表面码的预训练GNN [Physical Review Research, 7(2):023181, 2025],我们在相同采样的综合征上将其软输出与MWPM互补间隙进行比较。我们发现基于GNN logit的后选择产生的逻辑错误率低于基于MWPM间隙的后选择。逐次来看,有符号的GNN置信度分布在低和中间值处类似于有符号的MWPM间隙,但对许多正确解码的shots赋予更高的置信度。虽然两个分数都近似于后验对数似然比,但GNN置信度幅度更接近其理想值。这些结果表明,仅基于综合征和逻辑标签训练的神经网络解码器同时学习了类似间隙的判别能力和定量置信度尺度,从而在MWPM间隙估计不可用、成本高或与噪声模型不匹配时,能够实现基于置信度的后选择。

英文摘要:

To utilize quantum error-correcting codes, a decoder must infer the logical sector from the measured syndrome. Beyond a hard logical decision, some decoders provide soft information estimating its reliability. For minimum-weight perfect matching (MWPM), a common confidence measure is the complementary, or logical, gap. Neural-network decoders trained with binary cross entropy naturally output a different score, the logit, whose relation to the matching gap remains unclear. Here, we test whether the logit of a graph neural network (GNN) decoder behaves as a learned proxy for the logical gap. Using a pretrained GNN for the rotated surface code under uniform circuit-level noise [PRR, 7(2):023181, 2025], we compare its logit with the MWPM gap shot by shot on identical syndromes. The native GNN decoder-logit pair yields a lower post-selected logical error rate than the native MWPM decoder-gap pair over the operationally relevant range of acceptance rates. Exchanging the scores between decoders isolates score discrimination from hard-decision accuracy and shows that both contribute to the advantage. At larger distances each score best ranks failures of its own decoder, whereas at small distance, where the bounded matching gap saturates, the learned confidence better discriminates MWPM failures than the gap itself. Finally, GNN confidence is substantially better described by the posterior logistic form implied by an ideal log-likelihood ratio, while the MWPM gap shows systematic departures. Thus, a neural-network decoder trained only on syndromes and logical labels learns a gap-like confidence proxy whose native scale more closely follows the expected posterior calibration form, supporting learned soft output when MWPM gap estimates are unavailable, costly, or insufficiently expressive.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑