arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2606.07331quant-phcond-mat.dis-nn
收藏

经典绝热退火在伊辛机上的性能分析

Performance analysis of classical adiabatic annealing on Ising machines

Vrije Universiteit Brussel(布鲁塞尔自由大学)

Jacob Lamers, Guy Verschaffelt, Guy Van der Sande

AI总结:

本文通过连续方法分析经典绝热退火技术,提出混合经典绝热退火策略,并在MaxCut等问题上测试,发现其相比现有简单方法无显著优势。

摘要:

伊辛机是解决组合优化问题的一种有前景的方法。它们将这些问题映射到伊辛模型上,并搜索低能量构型。然而,导航这些系统的崎岖能量景观仍然困难。为了改善导航,文献中提出了经典绝热退火作为经典伊辛机的一种启发式优化方法。使用这种技术,伊辛机的哈密顿量逐渐从一个易解的哈密顿量变换到目标哈密顿量。然而,其声称的有效性主要源于与量子绝热退火的类比,系统性的基准测试仍然有限。在这项工作中,我们使用连续方法分析经典绝热退火技术。受此分析见解的启发,我们提出了一种优化的退火策略,称为混合经典绝热退火。我们使用最多800个自旋的MaxCut实例和带外场的问题对我们的策略进行基准测试,对于有限的问题集,它实现了边际改进。我们得出结论,尽管有理论动机且偶尔有益,但混合策略相对于现有的更简单技术并没有提供足够的实际优势。

英文摘要:

Ising machines are a promising approach to solve combinatorial optimization problems. They map these problems onto the Ising model and search for low-energy configurations. However, navigating the rugged energy landscapes of these systems remains difficult. To improve this navigation, classical adiabatic annealing has been proposed in the literature as a heuristic optimization method for classical Ising machines. Using this technique, the Hamiltonian of the Ising machine is gradually transformed from an easily solvable Hamiltonian to the target Hamiltonian. However, its purported effectiveness is primarily motivated by an analogy to quantum adiabatic annealing, and systematic benchmarking has remained limited. In this work, we analyze the classical adiabatic annealing technique using continuation methods. Motivated by insights from this analysis, we propose an optimized annealing strategy we refer to as hybrid classical adiabatic annealing. We benchmark our proposed strategy using MaxCut instances with up to 800 spins and problems with external fields, for which it achieves a marginal improvement for a limited set of problems. We conclude that, although theoretically motivated and occasionally beneficial, the hybrid strategy does not offer a sufficient practical advantage over simpler, existing techniques.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑