arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2606.06076cs.AIcs.CV

通过模态差距感知自蒸馏从符号状态学习视觉空间规划

Learning Visual Spatial Planning from Symbolic State via Modality-Gap-Aware Self-Distillation

Tsinghua University(清华大学);The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology(香港科技大学)

Haocheng Luo, Jiahui Liu, Ruicheng Zhang, Zhizhou Zhong, Jiaqi Huang, Zunnan Xu, Quan Shi, Jun Zhou, Shuiyang Mao, Wei Liu, Xiu Li

AI总结:

提出MGSD两阶段框架,通过冷启动接地和特权教师蒸馏弥合视觉与符号规划之间的模态差距,在视觉规划基准上显著提升性能。

摘要:

尽管视觉-语言模型在通用多模态理解方面表现出色,但在视觉空间规划上仍存在困难。我们将其归因于感知-推理模态差距:视觉规划要求模型从像素中推断潜在状态结构,然后对恢复的结构进行推理以产生有效动作,而符号规划直接利用显式对象和约束。这造成了视觉状态恢复和多步规划的双重瓶颈。为解决此问题,我们提出MGSD,一种两阶段模态差距感知自蒸馏框架。首先,冷启动接地阶段为视觉学生模型配备可靠的状态表示,最小化早期感知噪声。其次,特权教师通过在线策略蒸馏转移规划能力,使用显式符号状态监督学生自身的视觉 rollout 前缀。关键在于,符号数据仅在训练期间使用,推理完全基于视觉。在视觉规划基准上的实验表明,MGSD在4B和8B骨干网络上均持续提升视觉规划性能,宏观平均值分别提高19.3%和18.4%。所得模型缩小了与符号输入上限的差距,而消融和诊断实验证实改进来自视觉状态恢复和最优路径推理。这些结果表明,模态差距感知自蒸馏不仅改善了模型感知可行动状态的方式,也改善了它们在推断结构上进行规划的能力。代码见 https://github.com/Oranger-l/MGSD。

英文摘要:

While Vision-Language Models excel at general multimodal understanding, they still struggle with visual spatial planning. We attribute this limitation to a perception--reasoning modality gap. Visual planning requires models to infer latent state structures from pixels and then reason over the recovered structure to produce valid actions, whereas symbolic planning directly leverages explicit representation. This discrepancy introduces two sequential bottlenecks: visual state recovery at the perception stage and multi-step planning at the reasoning stage. To address this, we propose MGSD, a two-stage modality-gap-aware self-distillation framework. First, a cold-start grounding stage establishes reliable visual state recovery before on-policy training. Second, a symbol-guided on-policy self-distillation stage transfers the privileged teacher's planning behavior to the student through token-level supervision on student-generated prefixes. Crucially, symbolic information is used only during training, while inference relies exclusively on visual inputs. Experiments on visual planning benchmarks show that MGSD consistently improves performance across different model scales, raising the macro average by 19.3% and 18.4%, respectively. The resulting models substantially reduce the gap to the upper bounds obtained with symbolic inputs. Ablation studies and diagnostic analyses further confirm that the gains arise from improvements in both visual state recovery and optimal-path reasoning. These results demonstrate that MGSD strengthens not only the recovery of actionable states from visual observations but also the ability to plan over the inferred structures. Code is available at https://github.com/Oranger-l/MGSD.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑