arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2606.03485cs.HC

使用移动眼动追踪分析乐队排练期间的视觉注意模式

Analyzing Visual Attention Patterns During Band Rehearsal with Mobile Eye Tracking

Aarhus University(奥胡斯大学);University of Stuttgart(斯图加特大学)

Arvind Srinivasan, Tobias Rau, Michael Sedlmair

AI总结:

本研究通过移动眼动追踪技术,分析四名乐队成员在排练中的注视行为,发现以领队为中心的枢纽-辐射式注意力拓扑结构,并量化了学习过程中的注视稳定性变化。

摘要:

视觉注意对合奏协调至关重要,但音乐家在自然排练中如何分配目光仍知之甚少。我们进行了一项初步研究,使用移动眼动追踪检查一个四成员乐队在三首歌曲(每首练习两次)中的注视行为。音乐家佩戴了Pupil Labs Neon眼动追踪器,YOLOv8辅助的场景注释将注视映射到合奏成员和视野中的物体。通过分析注视矩阵、转移矩阵、时间围巾图和驻留-转移相关性,我们揭示了一种枢纽-辐射式注意力拓扑结构:排练领队是所有成员的主要注视目标,而学习中的吉他手将高达97%的人际驻留时间集中在这个单一参考点上。在尝试之间,对于不熟悉的材料,注视转移平均减少高达65%(个别参与者高达82%),扫描趋于稳定。围巾图显示教学中断如何分散注意力,而连续运行则巩固注意力。排练后的参与者反思与定量模式一致,我们讨论了这些发现对合奏教学中注视感知工具的意义。

英文摘要:

Visual attention is central to ensemble coordination, yet how musicians allocate gaze during naturalistic rehearsal remains poorly understood. We present a pilot study using mobile eye tracking to examine gaze behaviour in a four-member band across three songs, each practiced twice. Musicians wore Pupil Labs Neon eye trackers, and YOLOv8-assisted scene annotations mapped fixations to ensemble members and objects in view. Analyzing fixation matrices, transition matrices, temporal scarf plots, and dwell-transition correlations, we uncover a hub-and-spoke attention topology: the session leader was the dominant gaze target for all members, while the learning guitarist concentrated up to 97% of interpersonal dwell on this single reference. Between attempts, gaze transitions decreased by up to 65% on average for unfamiliar material (up to 82% for individual participants) as scanning stabilized. Scarf plots reveal how teaching breakdowns fragment attention and uninterrupted runs consolidate it. Post-session participant reflections align with the quantitative patterns, and we discuss implications for gaze-aware tools in ensemble pedagogy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑