arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.17694cs.CL

大语言模型在权力不对称对话中是否反映社会认知效应?

Do LLM Agents Mirror Socio-Cognitive Effects in Power-Asymmetric Conversations?

UNC Chapel Hill(北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校)

Anvesh Rao Vijjini, Sagar Manjunath, Snigdha Chaturvedi

AI总结:

研究探讨了大语言模型在被赋予高或低地位角色时是否表现出与人类相似的社会认知效应,通过模拟多轮权力不对称对话,分析语言协调、代词使用、说服成功率和对危险请求的遵从性,发现模型在权力效应上表现出关键特征,但存在差异和变异性。

摘要:

权力差异通过已知的社会认知效应塑造人类交流,包括语言协调、代词使用、权威偏见和有害遵从。我们检验了大型语言模型(LLMs)在被赋予高或低地位角色时是否表现出类似行为。使用来自不同职业的拟人化角色,我们模拟多轮、权力不对称的对话(例如,校长与教师、法官与律师),并测量(i)语言协调、(ii)代词使用、(iii)说服成功率以及(iv)对危险请求的遵从性。我们的结果表明,LLMs 显示出权力的社会认知效应,尽管存在细微差别和变异性,将模拟交互与既 desirable 又 unsafe 的行为联系起来。

英文摘要:

Power differences shape human communication through well documented socio cognitive effects, including language coordination, pronoun usage, authority bias, and harmful compliance. We examine whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar behaviors when assigned high or low status personas. Using personas from diverse professions, we simulate multi turn, power asymmetric dialogues (e.g., principal teacher, justice lawyer) and measure (i) language coordination, (ii) pronoun usage, (iii) persuasion success, and (iv) compliance with unsafe requests. Our results show that LLMs show key socio-cognitive effects of power, albeit with nuances and variability, linking simulated interactions to both desirable and unsafe behaviors.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑