arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.08028cs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
收藏

自适应域分解物理信息神经网络用于稀疏传感器数据的交通状态估计

Observation-Aligned Two-Stage Domain Decomposition for Physics-Informed Traffic State Estimation with Sparse Fixed Sensors

Lyles School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Purdue University(普渡大学土木与建设工程学院)

Eunhan Ka, Ludovic Leclercq, Satish V. Ukkusuri

AI总结:

本文提出自适应域分解物理信息神经网络(ADD-PINN),通过残差引导框架实现基于LWR模型的离线速度场重建,在稀疏传感器数据下取得更低的L2误差和更快的训练速度。

摘要:

从稀疏固定传感器估计交通状态具有挑战性,因为物理信息神经网络(PINNs)倾向于过度平滑Lighthill-Whitham-Richards(LWR)模型允许的激波。本文提出自适应域分解物理信息神经网络(ADD-PINN),一种基于LWR的离线速度场重建的两阶段残差引导框架。首先训练一个粗粒度全局PINN;然后利用其空间残差剖面确定子域边界并初始化子网络,在分解模式下进行分解,同时数据驱动的激波指示器可以在局部证据较弱时保留单域回退。主要的离线I-24 MOTION评估覆盖五天、五种传感器配置和每种配置十个种子,总计1500次运行。与神经网络和物理信息基线相比,ADD-PINN在25种配置中的18种和15种稀疏传感情况中的14种中取得了最低的相对L2误差,同时训练速度比扩展PINN(XPINN)基线快2.4倍。消融研究支持空间-only分解作为固定传感器交通重建的有效默认设置。补充下一代模拟(NGSIM)实验作为负对照:激波指示器在所有50次运行中抑制分解,而默认的单域回退在所有传感器配置中排名第一。这些结果支持残差引导的空间分解作为PINN家族设计在稀疏固定传感与局部转换区域重合时的有效方法。

英文摘要:

Traffic state estimation from sparse fixed sensors is challenging because physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) tend to over-smooth sharp transitions admitted by the Lighthill-Whitham--Richards (LWR) model. This study proposes Two-Stage Domain Decomposition Physics-Informed Neural Networks (TSDD-PINN), an observation-aligned framework for LWR-based offline speed-field reconstruction. The framework supports spatial, temporal, and space--time refinement. Matched direction analysis shows that spatial refinement has the lowest mean error and less than half the training time of space--time refinement in the tested setting, while temporal refinement is faster. A global parent PINN is first trained. In the controlled spatial implementation, its residual profile guides a deterministic partition for warm-started child networks. An optional operational safeguard retains Stage~1 when the prespecified screen does not activate. The primary I-24 MOTION evaluation spans five days, five sensor configurations, and ten seeds per configuration, yielding 1{,}500 runs. Controlled TSDD-PINN attains the lowest relative $L_2$ error in 18 of 25 configurations and 14 of 15 sparse-sensing cases, while training 2.4 times faster than the extended PINN (XPINN) baseline under the evaluated implementations and training budgets. Non-neural comparisons show that the advantage over interpolation is concentrated under sparse sensing, whereas dense sensing often favors interpolation. A separate 250-run operational evaluation finds infrequent activation and motivates the Stage-1-preserving safeguard. The residual is treated as an indicator of model difficulty rather than a validated shock detector. The evidence supports a sensing-density-dependent operating range rather than uniform improvement.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑