arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2603.23694cs.CV

CoRe:基于对比学习的医学图像配准联合优化

CoRe: Joint Optimization with Contrastive Learning for Medical Image Registration

Insitute of Medical Informatics, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany(吕贝克大学医学信息学研究所)

Eytan Kats, Christoph Grossbroehmer, Ziad Al-Haj Hemidi, Fenja Falta, Wiebke Heyer, Mattias P. Heinrich

AI总结:

本文提出CoRe框架,将对比学习直接整合到配准模型中,通过联合优化对比和配准目标,提升特征表示的鲁棒性,实验表明在腹部和胸腔配准任务中性能优于基线方法。

摘要:

医学图像配准是医学图像分析中的基础任务,能够对不同模态或时间点的图像进行对齐。然而,强度不一致和非线性组织变形对配准方法的鲁棒性构成重大挑战。最近利用自监督表征学习的方法通过预训练特征提取器生成鲁棒的解剖嵌入,进一步用于配准。在本工作中,我们提出了一种新颖的框架,将等价对比学习直接整合到配准模型中。我们的方法利用对比学习的力量学习鲁棒的特征表示,这些表示对组织变形具有不变性。通过联合优化对比和配准目标,我们确保学习的表示不仅具有信息性,而且适合配准任务。我们在腹部和胸腔配准任务中评估了我们的方法,包括同患者和跨患者场景。实验结果表明,将对比学习直接整合到配准框架中显著提高了性能,超过了强大的基线方法。

英文摘要:

Medical image registration is a fundamental task in medical image analysis, enabling the alignment of images from different modalities or time points. However, intensity inconsistencies and nonlinear tissue deformations pose significant challenges to the robustness of registration methods. Recent approaches leveraging self-supervised representation learning show promise by pre-training feature extractors to generate robust anatomical embeddings, that farther used for the registration. In this work, we propose a novel framework that integrates equivariant contrastive learning directly into the registration model. Our approach leverages the power of contrastive learning to learn robust feature representations that are invariant to tissue deformations. By jointly optimizing the contrastive and registration objectives, we ensure that the learned representations are not only informative but also suitable for the registration task. We evaluate our method on abdominal and thoracic image registration tasks, including both intra-patient and inter-patient scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that the integration of contrastive learning directly into the registration framework significantly improves performance, surpassing strong baseline methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑