arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.01232q-fin.RM
收藏

亚模性风险度量

Submodular risk measures

University of Waterloo(滑铁卢大学)

Ruodu Wang, Jingcheng Yu

AI总结:

本文研究了对称不变函数的亚模性,证明凸风险度量的亚模性条件,并通过实证发现ES无违规,而VaR和AES存在不同程度的违规。

摘要:

我们研究了对称不变函数的亚模性,特别是凸风险度量。预期损失是模性,而当损失函数是凸时,确定等价是亚模性。对称不变一致风险度量是亚模性当且仅当它们是一致扭曲风险度量,包括预期短缺(ES),以及一些偏差度量也是亚模性。除了正齐次性外,亚模性对凸风险度量具有约束力。我们通过Arrow-Pratt风险厌恶测度完全表征了短差风险度量,证明优化的确定等价总是亚模性,并证明调整后的预期短缺(AES)是亚模性仅当它还原为ES。对每日美国股票回报的实证研究发现没有ES亚模性违规,许多VaR违规,以及相对较少的AES违规。

英文摘要:

We study submodularity for law-invariant functionals, with particular attention to convex risk measures. Expected losses are modular, and certainty equivalents are submodular exactly when the loss function is convex. Law-invariant coherent risk measures are submodular exactly when they are coherent distortion risk measures, including Expected Shortfall (ES), and several deviation measures are also submodular. Beyond positive homogeneity, submodularity is restrictive for convex risk measures. We give a complete characterization for shortfall risk measures via the Arrow--Pratt measure of risk aversion, show that optimized certainty equivalents are always submodular, and prove that adjusted Expected Shortfall (AES) is submodular only when it reduces to ES. An empirical illustration for daily US equity returns finds no ES submodularity violations, many Value-at-Risk (VaR) violations, and relatively few AES violations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑