arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.24232cs.DScs.LG
收藏

通过度量森林补全改进学习增强的生成树算法

Better Learning-Augmented Spanning Tree Algorithms via Metric Forest Completion

Texas A&M University(德克萨斯大学);Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory(劳伦斯利弗莫尔国家实验室)

Nate Veldt, Thomas Stanley, Benjamin W. Priest, Trevor Steil, Keita Iwabuchi, T. S. Jayram, Grace J. Li, Geoffrey Sanders

AI总结:

本文提出了一种改进的学习增强生成树算法,通过度量森林补全框架,在任意度量空间中实现更优的近似最小生成树算法。

摘要:

我们提出了改进的学习增强算法,用于在任意度量空间中找到近似最小生成树(MST)。我们的工作基于最近提出的度量森林补全(MFC)框架,其中学习的输入是一个森林,必须添加额外的边才能形成完整的生成树。Veldt等人(2025)证明了最优补全森林需要Ω(n²)时间,但设计了一个具有亚二次复杂度的2.62近似算法用于MFC。相同的方法对于原始MST问题是一个(2γ+1)近似算法,其中γ≥1是初始森林的质量参数。我们引入了一种通用方法,该方法在先前算法和最优Ω(n²)时间MFC算法之间进行插值。我们的方法只考虑与越来越多的策略性选择的“代表”点相关联的边。我们的分析的一个推论是将先前算法的近似因子从2.62 for MFC和(2γ+1) for metric MST改进到2和2γ分别。我们证明这在最坏情况下是紧的,但使用我们的通用方法,我们仍然可以获得更好的实例特定近似。我们用详尽的实验评估来补充我们的理论结果。

英文摘要:

We present improved learning-augmented algorithms for finding an approximate minimum spanning tree (MST) for points in an arbitrary metric space. Our work follows a recent framework called metric forest completion (MFC), where the learned input is a forest that must be given additional edges to form a full spanning tree. Veldt et al. (2025) showed that optimally completing the forest takes $Ω(n^2)$ time, but designed a 2.62-approximation for MFC with subquadratic complexity. The same method is a $(2γ+ 1)$-approximation for the original MST problem, where $γ\geq 1$ is a quality parameter for the initial forest. We introduce a generalized method that interpolates between this prior algorithm and an optimal $Ω(n^2)$-time MFC algorithm. Our approach considers only edges incident to a growing number of strategically chosen ``representative'' points. One corollary of our analysis is to improve the approximation factor of the previous algorithm from 2.62 for MFC and $(2γ+1)$ for metric MST to 2 and $2γ$ respectively. We prove this is tight for worst-case instances, but we still obtain better instance-specific approximations using our generalized method. We complement our theoretical results with a thorough experimental evaluation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑