arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.23371cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL

领域划分混合RAG用于法律推理:迈向模块化和可解释的印度法律AI

Domain-Partitioned Hybrid RAG for Legal Reasoning: Toward Modular and Explainable Legal AI for India

Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani(巴尔·印度技术科学学院,比兰地)

Rakshita Goel, S Pranav Kumar, Anmol Agrawal, Divyan Poddar, Pratik Narang, Dhruv Kumar

AI总结:

本研究提出了一种针对印度法律研究的领域划分混合RAG与知识图谱架构,通过模块化设计和结构化关系推理提升法律AI的可解释性和推理能力。

摘要:

印度的法律研究涉及在涵盖法规、宪法条款、刑法和司法先例的长而异质的文档中导航,其中仅基于关键词或嵌入的检索系统往往无法支持结构化的法律推理。最近的检索增强生成(RAG)方法虽然增强了基础,但在多跳推理、引用链和跨领域依赖性方面存在困难。我们提出了一种专门针对印度法律研究的领域划分混合RAG和知识图谱架构。该系统集成了三个专门的RAG管道,涵盖最高法院判例法、法规和宪法文本以及印度刑法,每个都针对特定领域进行了优化。为了实现超越语义相似性的关系推理,我们构建了一个基于Neo4j的法律知识图谱,捕捉案件、法规、刑法条款、法官和引用之间的结构化关系。一个由LLM驱动的代理协调器动态地将查询路由到检索模块和知识图谱,将证据融合到有据可查且引用意识的响应中。我们使用一个40个问题的合成法律问答基准测试进行评估,该基准测试从权威的印度法律来源中编纂,并通过LLM作为法官框架进行评估。结果表明,该混合架构实现了70%的通过率,明显优于仅RAG基准测试的37.5%,在完整性和法律推理质量上也有显著提升。这些发现表明,结合领域划分检索与结构化关系知识为印度司法背景下高级法律AI系统提供了可扩展和可解释的基础。

英文摘要:

Legal research in India involves navigating long and heterogeneous documents spanning statutes, constitutional provisions, penal codes, and judicial precedents, where purely keyword-based or embedding-only retrieval systems often fail to support structured legal reasoning. Recent retrieval augmented generation (RAG) approaches improve grounding but struggle with multi-hop reasoning, citation chaining, and cross-domain dependencies inherent to legal texts. We propose a domain partitioned hybrid RAG and Knowledge Graph architecture designed specifically for Indian legal research. The system integrates three specialized RAG pipelines covering Supreme Court case law, statutory and constitutional texts, and the Indian Penal Code, each optimized for domain specific retrieval. To enable relational reasoning beyond semantic similarity, we construct a Neo4j based Legal Knowledge Graph capturing structured relationships among cases, statutes, IPC sections, judges, and citations. An LLM driven agentic orchestrator dynamically routes queries across retrieval modules and the knowledge graph, fusing evidence into grounded and citation aware responses. We evaluate the system using a 40 question synthetic legal question answer benchmark curated from authoritative Indian legal sources and assessed via an LLM as a Judge framework. Results show that the hybrid architecture achieves a 70 percent pass rate, substantially outperforming a RAG only baseline at 37.5 percent, with marked improvements in completeness and legal reasoning quality. These findings demonstrate that combining domain partitioned retrieval with structured relational knowledge provides a scalable and interpretable foundation for advanced legal AI systems in the Indian judicial context.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑