arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2309.14735cs.CLcs.AI

印度语境下的法律问答:现代AI模型的效能、挑战与潜力

Legal Question-Answering in the Indian Context: Efficacy, Challenges, and Potential of Modern AI Models

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur(印度理工学院坎普尔分校);Symbiosis Law School Pune(浦那共生法学院)

Shubham Kumar Nigam, Shubham Kumar Mishra, Ayush Kumar Mishra, Noel Shallum, Arnab Bhattacharya

AI总结:

本研究比较了现代AI模型在印度法律问答中的效能,以GPT为基准,评估AILQA范式在刑事法律领域的表现,结合实证与专家见解,揭示其潜力与挑战。

摘要:

法律问答平台有望改变法律专家处理法学文献的方式。在本研究中,我们对当代AI框架进行了比较性探索,评估其在满足印度法律环境独特需求方面的能力,重点关注印度法律问答(AILQA)。我们的讨论聚焦于一系列检索和问答机制,并以OpenAI GPT模型作为参考基准。研究结果强调了现有AILQA范式在解码自然语言提示和生成精确回答方面的熟练度。本研究范围限定于印度刑事法律领域,该领域以其复杂性和相关的后勤限制而著称。为确保评估的全面性,我们将实证指标与经验丰富的法律从业者的见解进行对比,从而全面描绘AI在印度法律问答领域中的潜力与挑战。

英文摘要:

Legal QA platforms bear the promise to metamorphose the manner in which legal experts engage with jurisprudential documents. In this exposition, we embark on a comparative exploration of contemporary AI frameworks, gauging their adeptness in catering to the unique demands of the Indian legal milieu, with a keen emphasis on Indian Legal Question Answering (AILQA). Our discourse zeroes in on an array of retrieval and QA mechanisms, positioning the OpenAI GPT model as a reference point. The findings underscore the proficiency of prevailing AILQA paradigms in decoding natural language prompts and churning out precise responses. The ambit of this study is tethered to the Indian criminal legal landscape, distinguished by its intricate nature and associated logistical constraints. To ensure a holistic evaluation, we juxtapose empirical metrics with insights garnered from seasoned legal practitioners, thereby painting a comprehensive picture of AI's potential and challenges within the realm of Indian legal QA.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑