arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.19232cs.HCcs.CY
收藏

基于论坛和聊天的心理健康社区中同伴支持的比较分析:社会支持的技术-结构-功能模型

A Comparative Analysis of Peer Support in Forum-based and Chat-based Mental Health Communities: Technical-Structural-Functional Model of Social Support

Cornell University(康奈尔大学)

Han Li

AI总结:

本文通过比较论坛和聊天式心理健康社区,提出社会支持的技术-结构-功能模型,揭示不同网络结构对支持类型的影响,为设计更有效的支持社区提供依据。

摘要:

在线支持社区已成为为面临心理健康挑战的个人提供各种形式支持的重要空间。尽管存在大量具有不同技术结构的平台,但人们对这些特征如何塑造支持动态以及其中的社会技术机制知之甚少。本研究引入了社会支持的技术-结构-功能模型,并系统比较了20个论坛式和20个聊天式心理健康社区中的通信网络结构和支持类型。利用监督机器学习和社会网络分析,我们发现论坛式社区更促进信息性和情感性支持,而聊天式社区则更促进陪伴。这些模式在一定程度上由网络结构解释:论坛中较高的入度集中度导致信息性支持的普遍性,而聊天组中去中心化的回复模式则导致更多陪伴。这些发现将支持的结构-功能模型扩展到了在线环境,并为设计符合用户支持需求的支持社区提供了可操作的指导。

英文摘要:

Online support communities have become vital spaces offering varied forms of support to individuals facing mental health challenges. Despite the proliferation of platforms with distinct technical structures, little is known about how these features shape support dynamics and the socio-technical mechanisms at play. This study introduces a technical-structural-functional model of social support and systematically compares communication network structures and support types in 20 forum-based and 20 chat-based mental health communities. Using supervised machine learning and social network analysis, we find that forum-based communities foster more informational and emotional support, whereas chat-based communities promote greater companionship. These patterns were partially explained by network structure: higher in-degree centralization in forums accounted for the prevalence of informational support, while decentralized reply patterns in chat groups accounted for more companionship. These findings extend the structural-functional model of support to online contexts and provide actionable guidance for designing support communities that align technical structures with users' support needs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑