arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.18546cs.SIcs.CY
收藏

城市流动性网络中心性预测社会韧性

Urban mobility network centrality predicts social resilience

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology(香港科技大学);Tsinghua University(清华大学);Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (BNRist)(北京信息科学与技术国家研究中心);Northeastern University(东北大学);The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)(香港科技大学(广州));Santa Fe Institute(圣塔菲研究所);University of Chicago(芝加哥大学)

Lin Chen, Fengli Xu, Esteban Moro, Pan Hui, Yong Li, James Evans

AI总结:

研究通过分析城市流动性网络中心性,揭示核心场所在不同冲击下的社会韧性预测机制。

摘要:

城市依赖于促进福祉、创新和繁荣的社会互动,但外生冲击如疫情、飓风和野火可能会严重破坏这些互动。不同城市的场所表现出广泛不同的响应模式,引发了关键问题:是什么因素导致这些差异?我们如何预测和应对?理解这些问题对于保护社会韧性至关重要,即城市场所维持访问量和多样性的能力。在本研究中,我们分析了来自15个美国城市的大规模人类流动性数据,覆盖超过1亿居民,涵盖三种不同的城市冲击。尽管总体趋势是访问量下降和社会混合减弱,36.28%-53.01%的场所表现出减少的隔离,21.04%-38.55%的场所表现出增加的访问量。通过构建一个连接不同类型城市场所的流动性网络,我们发现特征向量网络中心性倾向于表明基本服务的提供,并且在各种城市冲击中稳健地预测社会韧性。具体而言,中心性通过提升预测隔离和流动性变化的解释力,比更直观的特征提高了超过80%。此外,与边缘场所相比,核心场所具有较短的访问距离、更广的邻里访问范围、更短的游客停留时间和更稳定的全天受欢迎程度。这些模式暗示了双重社会机制:核心场所通过频繁的非正式互动维持社会联系,而边缘场所则通过围绕专业兴趣及其相应社交圈促进更深入的参与。通过将城市流动性研究与区分必需品和非必需品的经济理论相结合,我们提出了一种well-and-pool类比,说明人们如何花费不同的城市流动性预算。

英文摘要:

Cities thrive on social interactions that foster well-being, innovation, and prosperity; yet, exogenous shocks such as pandemics, hurricanes, and wildfires can severely disrupt them. Different urban venues exhibit widely divergent response patterns, raising key questions about what factors contribute to these differences and how we can anticipate and respond. Understanding these questions is crucial for safeguarding social resilience, the capacity of urban venues to maintain both visitation and diversity. In this study, we analyze large-scale human mobility data from 15 US cities covering more than 103 million residents across three distinct urban shocks. Despite a general trend of declining visitation and weakened social mixing, 36.28%-53.01% of venues exhibit reduced segregation, and 21.04%-38.55% of venues exhibit increased visitation. By constructing a mobility network interlinking types of urban venues, we reveal that eigenvector network centrality tends to indicate the provision of essential services and robustly predicts social resilience across varied urban shocks. Specifically, centrality elevates the explanatory power by more than 80% in predicting both segregation and mobility change, compared with more intuitive features. Furthermore, compared to peripheral venues, core venues featuring shorter visit distances, broader neighborhood visitation, shorter visitor dwell times, and steadier popularity throughout the day. Such patterns imply a dual social mechanism: core venues sustain social ties through frequent informal interaction, while peripheral ones facilitate deeper engagement around specialized interests and their corresponding social circles. By bridging urban mobility research with economic theories that distinguish staple from discretionary products, we propose a well-and-pool analogy that suggests how people spend their varying urban mobility budgets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑