arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.01718cs.LG
收藏

重新审视超越独立同分布的泛化度量:在分布偏移下的实证研究

Generalization Measures under Controlled Covariate Shift: A Regime-Aware Benchmark

Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan(京都大学);National Institute of Applied Science(应用科学国家研究所);Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan(东京科学研究所)

Sora Nakai, Youssef Fadhloun, Kacem Mathlouthi, Kotaro Yoshida, Ganesh Talluri, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Hiroki Naganuma

AI总结:

本文通过实证研究评估了多种泛化度量在不同分布偏移下的稳健性,发现部分度量在不同设置中表现稳定,而其他度量易受分布偏移影响。

摘要:

泛化仍然是深度学习中一个核心但尚未解决的挑战,特别是利用在测试时间评估之前可用的量来预测模型在训练分布之外的性能的能力。基于Jiang等人(2020)的大型研究以及Dziugaite等人(2020)对训练配置不稳定性方面的关注,我们基准测试了超越独立同分布(IID)制度的泛化度量的稳健性。我们训练了超过10,000种超参数配置的小到中型模型,并评估了超过40种仅能从训练模型和可用训练数据中计算出的度量标准。我们显著扩展了实验范围沿多个轴:(i)将评估扩展到标准IID设置之外,包括对不同分布偏移的稳健性基准测试;(ii)评估多种架构和训练配方;(iii)新纳入基于校准和信息标准的度量标准,以评估其在IID和OOD泛化中的对齐程度。我们发现,分布偏移可以显著改变许多泛化度量的预测性能,而较小的子集在不同设置中相对稳定。

英文摘要:

Predicting generalization from quantities available before target-test evaluation remains a central challenge in deep learning. The systematic benchmark of Jiang et al. (2020) evaluated many generalization measures, but it focused on independent and identically distributed (IID) settings. We revisit this problem for image classifiers evaluated under controlled corruptions and perturbations. Our study uses CIFAR-10-C/P, where the label space and task remain fixed while the input images are degraded or perturbed. This setting also allows us to revisit the robustness concerns raised by Dziugaite et al. (2020), who showed that the apparent reliability of generalization measures can depend strongly on experimental conditions. Our experiments show that the usefulness of generalization measures is strongly regime-dependent. In our exploratory decision analysis across three CNN-style architectures, sharpness- and input-gradient-based measures are among the leading individual signals, whereas family results are close and architecture dependent. Optimization-based measures, Information Criteria, and Sharpness-based measures provide additional regime-dependent signals in correlation or local-reliability analyses. Together, these findings suggest that model selection should not rely only on measures favored by IID evaluation. Instead, within the evaluated CIFAR-10-C/P setting and architectures, generalization measures should be treated as regime-dependent ranking signals whose utility must be evaluated for the intended corruption or perturbation setting.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑