arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2601.14622cs.RO

通过视觉语言模型探索社交合规机器人导航的提示设计

Probing Prompt Design for Socially Compliant Robot Navigation with Vision Language Models

Hokkaido University(北海道大学);The University of Tokyo(东京大学)

Ling Xiao, Toshihiko Yamasaki

AI总结:

本文通过设计社交合规的提示策略,提升小型视觉语言模型在机器人导航中的行动准确性,发现与自我竞争的提示设计效果最佳。

摘要:

语言模型越来越多地用于社交机器人导航,但现有的基准测试大多忽视了为社交合规行为设计原理性提示的重要性。这一限制在实践中尤为相关,因为许多系统依赖小型视觉语言模型(VLMs)以提高效率。与大型语言模型相比,小型VLMs表现出较弱的决策能力,因此有效的提示设计对于准确导航至关重要。受人类学习和动机的认知理论启发,我们从两个维度研究提示设计:系统指导(以行动为中心、以推理为导向、以及感知-推理提示)和动机框架,其中模型与人类、其他人工智能系统或其过去的自我竞争。在两个社交合规导航数据集上的实验揭示了三个关键发现。首先,对于未微调的GPT-4o,与人类竞争表现最佳,而与其他AI系统竞争表现最差。对于微调模型,与模型过去的自我竞争产生最强结果,随后是与人类竞争,性能还受到提示设计、模型选择和数据集特征之间的耦合效应的影响。第二,不恰当的系统提示设计会显著降低性能,即使与直接微调相比也是如此。第三,尽管直接微调大幅提高了语义层面的指标,如感知、预测和推理,但其在行动准确性上的改进有限。相比之下,我们的系统提示在行动准确性上产生了不成比例的更大改进,表明所提出的提示设计主要作为决策层面的约束,而不是表征层面的增强。

英文摘要:

Language models are increasingly used for social robot navigation, yet existing benchmarks largely overlook principled prompt design for socially compliant behavior. This limitation is particularly relevant in practice, as many systems rely on small vision language models (VLMs) for efficiency. Compared to large language models, small VLMs exhibit weaker decision-making capabilities, making effective prompt design critical for accurate navigation. Inspired by cognitive theories of human learning and motivation, we study prompt design along two dimensions: system guidance (action-focused, reasoning-oriented, and perception-reasoning prompts) and motivational framing, where models compete against humans, other AI systems, or their past selves. Experiments on two socially compliant navigation datasets reveal three key findings. First, for non-finetuned GPT-4o, competition against humans achieves the best performance, while competition against other AI systems performs worst. For finetuned models, competition against the model's past self yields the strongest results, followed by competition against humans, with performance further influenced by coupling effects among prompt design, model choice, and dataset characteristics. Second, inappropriate system prompt design can significantly degrade performance, even compared to direct finetuning. Third, while direct finetuning substantially improves semantic-level metrics such as perception, prediction, and reasoning, it yields limited gains in action accuracy. In contrast, our system prompts produce a disproportionately larger improvement in action accuracy, indicating that the proposed prompt design primarily acts as a decision-level constraint rather than a representational enhancement.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑