arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2503.21168cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY

TAGA:一种基于切线的反应式方法,用于在人群体周围实现社交合规的机器人导航

TAGA: A Tangent-Based Reactive Approach for Socially Compliant Robot Navigation Around Human Groups

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, BRAC University(布拉格大学计算机科学与工程系);New Uzbekistan University(新乌兹别克斯坦大学)

Utsha Kumar Roy, Sejuti Rahman

AI总结:

提出TAGA方法,通过切线路径检测群体边界并协调群体与个体避障,引入群体穿越率(GCR)指标,在多种人群动力学模型下验证了反应式与学习型方法的非对称性效果。

摘要:

机器人在有人群的环境中导航时,必须避免碰撞并尊重人群的社会结构,特别是社会群体的隐含边界。大多数导航方法将人类建模为独立个体,即使无碰撞也会导致社交干扰行为。本文提出TAGA(群体避障的切线动作),通过切线路径机动检测群体边界,无需修改底层导航策略。一个分层安全控制器协调群体级避障与个体碰撞预防。我们提出群体穿越率(GCR),一个连续度量,衡量机器人在任何群体凸包内停留的时间步比例,提供比终端度量更细粒度的社交合规评估。我们引入了一个现实的人群模拟基准,包含五个基于经验的阶段:个体速度异质性、群体速度耦合、F-formation静态群体、领导者-跟随者动力学和凸包边界,并在ORCA和Social Force行人动力学下进行评估。在ORCA、Social Force、DS-RNN和Intention-RL上的实验揭示了反应式-学习型非对称性:TAGA对经典反应式基线提升最大(成功率最高+8pp,GCR减半),而对学习型策略成本近乎为零。这些发现为模块化群体感知何时增加价值以及端到端群体感知训练何时更优提供了可操作的指导。

英文摘要:

Robots navigating human-populated environments must avoid collisions while respecting the social structure of crowds, particularly the implicit boundaries of social groups. Most navigation approaches model humans as independent individuals,causing socially disruptive behavior even when collision-free. This paper presents TAGA (Tangent Action for Group Avoidance), detected group boundaries via tangent-path maneuvers without modifying the underlying navigation policy. A hierarchical safety controller coordinates group-level avoidance with individual collision prevention. We propose the Group Crossing Rate (GCR), a continuous metric measuring the fraction of timesteps the robot spends inside any group convex hull, providing finer-grained social compliance assessment than terminal metrics alone. We introduce a realistic crowd simulation benchmark with five empirically grounded phases: individual speed heterogeneity, group speed coupling, F-formation static groups, leader-follower dynamics, and convex-hull boundaries, evaluated under both ORCA and Social Force pedestrian dynamics. Experiments across ORCA, Social Force, DS-RNN, and Intention-RL reveal a reactive-learning asymmetry: TAGA provides the largest gains for classical reactive baselines (up to +8pp success rate, GCR halved) with near-zero cost for learned policies. These findings offer actionable guidance for when modular group-awareness adds value versus when end-to-end group-aware training is preferable.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑