arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.05366cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

在执行中迷失:大型语言模型在多语言环境下的工具调用鲁棒性研究

Lost in Execution: On the Multilingual Robustness of Tool Calling in Large Language Models

University of Southern California(南加州大学);Arizona State University(亚利桑那州立大学)

Zheng Luo, T Pranav Kutralingam, Ogochukwu N Okoani, Wanpeng Xu, Hua Wei, Xiyang Hu

AI总结:

研究探讨了多语言环境下大型语言模型工具调用的鲁棒性,通过MLCL基准测试发现参数值语言不匹配是主要失败模式,尽管策略减少错误但无法恢复英语水平性能。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)越来越多地被部署为通过结构化功能调用外部工具的代理。尽管最近的研究报告了在标准英语中心评估下强大的工具调用性能,但工具调用在多语言用户交互中的鲁棒性仍待探索。在本工作中,我们引入了MLCL诊断基准,并对中文、印地语和低资源语言伊博语的多语言工具调用进行了系统评估。通过细致的错误分析,我们发现即使意图理解和工具选择正确,许多失败仍然发生。我们识别出参数值语言不匹配是主导的失败模式,其中模型在用户语言中生成语义合适的参数值,违反了语言不变的执行惯例。我们进一步评估了几种推理时系统策略,并发现尽管这些策略显著减少了语言诱导的执行错误,但它们无法完全恢复英语水平的性能。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that invoke external tools through structured function calls. While recent work reports strong tool-calling performance under standard English-centric evaluations, the robustness of tool calling under multilingual user interactions remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce MLCL, a diagnostic benchmark, and conduct a systematic evaluation of multilingual tool calling across Chinese, Hindi, and the low-resource language Igbo. Through fine-grained error analysis, we show that many failures occur despite correct intent understanding and tool selection. We identify parameter value language mismatch as a dominant failure mode, where models generate semantically appropriate parameter values in the user's language, violating language-invariant execution conventions. We further evaluate several inference-time system strategies and find that while these strategies substantially reduce language-induced execution errors, none of them can fully recover English-level performance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑