arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.02099cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

分析多语言语言模型中跨语言知识转移的评估

Analyzing the Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer in Multilingual Language Models

University of Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹大学)

Sara Rajaee, Christof Monz

AI总结:

本文质疑多语言模型零样本跨语言性能评估的有效性,通过多语言实例实验证明高性能多源于任务与表面知识而非真实语言转移,呼吁改进评估设置。

摘要:

近期在大规模数据集上训练多语言语言模型的进展似乎已在跨语言知识转移方面展现出有前景的结果,并在下游任务上取得了高性能。然而,我们质疑当前的评估基准和设置在多大程度上准确衡量了零样本跨语言知识转移。在本工作中,我们通过引入涉及多语言实例的更具挑战性的设置,挑战了目标任务上的高零样本性能反映高跨语言能力这一假设。通过大量实验和分析,我们表明所观察到的多语言模型的高性能在很大程度上可归因于不需要实际语言知识转移的因素,如任务层面和表面层面的知识。更具体地,我们观察到跨语言转移的主要是数据伪影和偏差,尤其是对于低资源语言。我们的发现凸显了现有跨语言测试数据和评估设置中被忽视的缺陷,呼吁对多语言模型的跨语言能力进行更细致的理解。

英文摘要:

Recent advances in training multilingual language models on large datasets seem to have shown promising results in knowledge transfer across languages and achieve high performance on downstream tasks. However, we question to what extent the current evaluation benchmarks and setups accurately measure zero-shot cross-lingual knowledge transfer. In this work, we challenge the assumption that high zero-shot performance on target tasks reflects high cross-lingual ability by introducing more challenging setups involving instances with multiple languages. Through extensive experiments and analysis, we show that the observed high performance of multilingual models can be largely attributed to factors not requiring the transfer of actual linguistic knowledge, such as task- and surface-level knowledge. More specifically, we observe what has been transferred across languages is mostly data artifacts and biases, especially for low-resource languages. Our findings highlight the overlooked drawbacks of existing cross-lingual test data and evaluation setups, calling for a more nuanced understanding of the cross-lingual capabilities of multilingual models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑