arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2601.03435cs.CL
收藏

在测量文档相似性中的方面作用的至关重要性

The Critical Role of Aspects in Measuring Document Similarity

Department of Computer Science University of Central Florida(佛罗里达大学中央分校计算机科学系)

Eftekhar Hossain, Tarnika Hazra, Ahatesham Bhuiyan, Santu Karmaker

AI总结:

ASPECTSIM通过显式考虑方面来提高文档相似性测量的人类-机器一致性,尽管在小型开源模型上效果有限,但仍展示了改进的方向。

摘要:

我们介绍了ASPECTSIM,一个简单且可解释的框架,要求将文档相似性条件地指定在显式指定的方面上,这与传统的整体方法在测量文档相似性上不同。通过一个新构建的包含26,000个方面-文档对的基准,我们发现,当使用直接GPT-4o提示实施时,ASPECTSIM在人类-机器一致性方面(约高80%)优于没有显式方面的整体相似性。这些发现强调了在测量文档相似性时显式考虑方面的重要性,并突显了需要修订标准实践的必要性。接下来,我们进行了一次大规模的元评估,使用16个较小的开源LLM和9个嵌入模型,重点是使ASPECTSIM易于访问和可重复。虽然直接提示LLM生成ASPECTSIM分数被发现无效(人类-机器一致性为20-30%),但一个简单的两阶段细化提高了其一致性约140%。然而,一致性仍低于基于GPT-4o的模型,表明较小的开源LLM在捕捉方面条件相似性方面仍落后于大型专有模型。

英文摘要:

We introduce ASPECTSIM, a simple and interpretable framework that requires conditioning document similarity on an explicitly specified aspect, which is different from the traditional holistic approach in measuring document similarity. Experimenting with a newly constructed benchmark of 26K aspect-document pairs, we found that ASPECTSIM, when implemented with direct GPT-4o prompting, achieves substantially higher human-machine agreement ($\approx$80% higher) than the same for holistic similarity without explicit aspects. These findings underscore the importance of explicitly accounting for aspects when measuring document similarity and highlight the need to revise standard practice. Next, we conducted a large-scale meta-evaluation using 16 smaller open-source LLMs and 9 embedding models with a focus on making ASPECTSIM accessible and reproducible. While directly prompting LLMs to produce ASPECTSIM scores turned out be ineffective (20-30% human-machine agreement), a simple two-stage refinement improved their agreement by $\approx$140%. Nevertheless, agreement remains well below that of GPT-4o-based models, indicating that smaller open-source LLMs still lag behind large proprietary models in capturing aspect-conditioned similarity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑