arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2402.01404cs.CL
收藏

关于文档级机器翻译系统中上下文利用的度量研究

On Measuring Context Utilization in Document-Level MT Systems

University of Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹大学)

Wafaa Mohammed, Vlad Niculae

AI总结:

针对文档级机器翻译中BLEU等指标无法反映上下文利用的问题,提出基于扰动的分析度量整体上下文利用,并度量支持性上下文对特定话语现象的贡献,自动标注可替代人工标注,强调使用话语丰富数据集。

摘要:

文档级翻译模型通常使用BLEU等通用指标进行评估,但这些指标无法反映上下文带来的益处。当前的上下文感知评估工作(如对比方法)仅衡量需要上下文消歧的词语的翻译准确性,无法揭示翻译模型是否使用了正确的支持性上下文。我们提出用上下文利用度量来补充基于准确性的评估。我们发现,基于扰动的分析(比较模型在提供正确上下文与随机上下文时的性能)是衡量整体上下文利用的有效方法。为了进行更细粒度的特定现象评估,我们提出度量支持性上下文对处理上下文相关话语现象的贡献程度。我们表明,自动标注的支持性上下文与人工标注的上下文得出的结论相似,可在缺乏人工标注的情况下作为替代方案。最后,我们强调在评估上下文利用时使用话语丰富数据集的重要性。

英文摘要:

Document-level translation models are usually evaluated using general metrics such as BLEU, which are not informative about the benefits of context. Current work on context-aware evaluation, such as contrastive methods, only measure translation accuracy on words that need context for disambiguation. Such measures cannot reveal whether the translation model uses the correct supporting context. We propose to complement accuracy-based evaluation with measures of context utilization. We find that perturbation-based analysis (comparing models' performance when provided with correct versus random context) is an effective measure of overall context utilization. For a finer-grained phenomenon-specific evaluation, we propose to measure how much the supporting context contributes to handling context-dependent discourse phenomena. We show that automatically-annotated supporting context gives similar conclusions to human-annotated context and can be used as alternative for cases where human annotations are not available. Finally, we highlight the importance of using discourse-rich datasets when assessing context utilization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑