arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2511.10892cs.CVcs.AI

MCN-CL:面向多模态情感识别的多模态交叉注意力网络与对比学习

MCN-CL: Multimodal Cross-Attention Network and Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Emotion Recognition

School of Computer and Information Engineering, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Anhui, 233030, China(计算机与信息工程学院,安徽财经大学,安徽,233030,中国);State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100045, China(认知科学与心理健康国家重点实验室,心理学研究所,中国科学院,北京,100045,中国)

Feng Li, Ke Wu, Yongwei Li

AI总结:

针对多模态情感识别现存的类别不均衡、时序建模难、模态异质性融合难问题,本文提出MCN-CL方法,通过三元查询机制与难负样本挖掘策略优化特征,在两个基准数据集上取得了优于SOTA的性能。

摘要:

多模态情感识别在心理健康监测、教育交互、人机交互等诸多领域发挥着关键作用。但现有方法通常面临三大挑战:类别分布不均衡、动态面部动作单元时序建模复杂度高、模态异质性导致的特征融合难度大。随着社交媒体场景下多模态数据的爆发式增长,构建高效的跨模态情感识别融合框架的需求愈发迫切。为此,本文提出面向多模态情感识别的多模态交叉注意力网络与对比学习方法MCN-CL,该方法采用三元查询机制与难负样本挖掘策略,在保留重要情感线索的同时去除特征冗余,有效解决模态异质性与类别不均衡问题。在IEMOCAP和MELD数据集上的实验结果表明,所提方法性能优于当前最优方法,加权F1值分别提升3.42%和5.73%。

英文摘要:

Multimodal emotion recognition plays a key role in many domains, including mental health monitoring, educational interaction, and human-computer interaction. However, existing methods often face three major challenges: unbalanced category distribution, the complexity of dynamic facial action unit time modeling, and the difficulty of feature fusion due to modal heterogeneity. With the explosive growth of multimodal data in social media scenarios, the need for building an efficient cross-modal fusion framework for emotion recognition is becoming increasingly urgent. To this end, this paper proposes Multimodal Cross-Attention Network and Contrastive Learning (MCN-CL) for multimodal emotion recognition. It uses a triple query mechanism and hard negative mining strategy to remove feature redundancy while preserving important emotional cues, effectively addressing the issues of modal heterogeneity and category imbalance. Experiment results on the IEMOCAP and MELD datasets show that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, with Weighted F1 scores improving by 3.42% and 5.73%, respectively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑