arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2510.25596astro-ph.CO
收藏

从DES Y3和Planck PR4 6×2pt数据约束 baryonic 反馈和宇宙学。I. ΛCDM模型

Constraining baryonic feedback and cosmology from DES Y3 and Planck PR4 6$\times$2pt data. I. $Λ$CDM models

University of Arizona(亚利桑那大学);Northeastern University(东北大学);Stony Brook University(石溪大学);Liverpool John Moores University(利物浦约翰摩尔斯大学)

Jiachuan Xu, Tim Eifler, Elisabeth Krause, Vivian Miranda, Jaime Salcido, Ian McCarthy

AI总结:

利用DES Y3和Planck PR4数据,研究ΛCDM模型中baryonic反馈的约束,发现弱反馈特征。

摘要:

我们结合弱透镜成像、星系聚类、宇宙微波背景(CMB)透镜成像及其交叉相关(所谓的6×2pt)数据,利用来自暗能量调查(DES)Y3 Maglim目录和Planck卫星PR4数据释放的数据,来约束宇宙学和baryonic反馈场景。我们包括DES Y3宇宙 shear 二点相关函数(2PCF)中所有数据点,直到2′.5,并通过ANTILLES模拟构建的主成分(PCs)来建模baryonic反馈过程。我们发现第一个PC的振幅Q₁与ANTILLES模拟中的平均归一化baryon质量分数Y_b= f_b/(Ω_b/Ω_m)之间存在紧密相关性,并利用Akino等人(2022)的独立Y_b测量作为Q₁的先验。我们训练了一个神经网络6×2pt模拟器,使分析速度提高了约1000倍,这使我们能够运行大量模拟分析以验证我们的分析在各种系统误差下的有效性。对于我们的6×2pt分析,我们发现S_8=0.8073±0.0094,当包括来自Y_b观测的Q₁先验时。这种宇宙学约束能力使我们能够对baryonic反馈的强度施加严格的限制。我们发现对于我们的6×2pt分析,Q₁=0.025^{+0.024}_{-0.029},当结合来自Planck、ACT、DESI的外部信息时,Q₁=0.043±0.016。所有这些结果表明弱反馈,例如与Illustris(Q₁=0.095)和OWLS AGN T8.7(Q₁=0.137)的张力分别为2.9σ-3.3σ和4.7σ-5.9σ。

英文摘要:

We combine weak lensing, galaxy clustering, cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing, and their cross-correlations (so-called 6$\times$2pt) to constrain cosmology and baryonic feedback scenarios using data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y3 Maglim catalog and the Planck satellite PR4 data release. We include all data points in the DES Y3 cosmic shear two-point correlation function (2PCF) down to 2.$^\prime$5 and model baryonic feedback processes via principal components (PCs) that are constructed from the ANTILLES simulations. We find a tight correlation between the amplitude of the first PC $Q_1$ and mean normalized baryon mass fraction $\bar{Y_\mathrm{b}}=\bar{f}_\mathrm{b}/(Ω_\mathrm{b}/Ω_\mathrm{m})$ from the ANTILLES simulations and employ an independent $\bar{Y_\mathrm{b}}$ measurement from Akino et al. (2022) as a prior of $Q_1$. We train a neural network $6\times2$pt emulator to boost the analysis speed by $\mathcal{O}(10^3)$, which enables us to run an impressive number of simulated analyses to validate our analysis against various systematics. For our 6$\times$2pt analysis, we find $S_8=0.8073\pm0.0094$ when including a $Q_1$ prior from $\bar{Y_\mathrm{b}}$ observations. This level of cosmological constraining power allows us to put tight constraints on the strength of baryonic feedback. We find $Q_1=0.025^{+0.024}_{-0.029}$ for our 6$\times$2pt analysis and $Q_1=0.043\pm{0.016}$ when combining with external information from Planck, ACT, DESI. All these results indicate weak feedback, e.g., the tensions to Illustris ($Q_1=0.095$) and OWLS AGN T8.7 ($Q_1=0.137$) are 2.9$σ$-3.3$σ$ and 4.7$σ$-5.9$σ$, respectively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑