arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2510.22166eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG

专家验证基于去噪扩散概率模型生成的合成颈椎X光片

Expert Validation of Synthetic Cervical Spine Radiographs Generated with a Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model

Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary(卡里尔大学医学学院);Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary(卡里尔大学临床神经科学系神经外科部);Department of Radiology, University of Calgary(卡里尔大学放射科);Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto(多伦多大学外科系神经外科部);Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto(多伦多大学医学影像科);Project neuroArm, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Calgary(卡里尔大学临床科学部neuroArm项目)
Austin A. Barr, Brij S. Karmur, Anthony J. Winder, Eddie Guo, John T. Lysack, James N. Scott, William F. Morrish, Muneer Eesa, Morgan Willson, David W. Cadotte,… 展开作者

Austin A. Barr, Brij S. Karmur, Anthony J. Winder, Eddie Guo, John T. Lysack, James N. Scott, William F. Morrish, Muneer Eesa, Morgan Willson, David W. Cadotte, Michael M. H. Yang, Ian Y. M. Chan, Sanju Lama, Garnette R. Sutherland

AI总结:

本研究利用去噪扩散概率模型生成合成颈椎X光片,经专家盲测验证其逼真度与真实图像无统计差异,并提供了大规模合成数据集,为神经影像机器学习应用开辟了新途径。

摘要:

神经外科中的机器学习受到组装大规模、高质量影像数据集挑战的限制。合成数据提供了一种可扩展、保护隐私的解决方案。我们评估了使用去噪扩散概率模型(DDPM)生成逼真的侧位颈椎X光片的可行性,该模型在来自颈椎X光图谱的4,963张图像上进行了训练。通过训练/验证损失和Fréchet初始距离监测模型性能,并由六名神经放射科医生和两名经过脊柱专科培训的神经外科医生进行盲法“临床图灵测试”评估合成图像质量。专家们审查了50组包含一张真实图像和三张合成图像的四元组,识别真实图像并按4点李克特量表评分其逼真度。专家在29%的试验中正确识别了真实图像(Fleiss' kappa=0.061)。真实图像(3.323)与合成图像(3.228、3.258和3.320;p=0.383、0.471、1.000)的平均逼真度评分相当。最近邻分析未发现记忆化证据。我们还提供了一个包含20,063张合成X光片的数据集。这些结果表明,DDPM生成的颈椎X光片在逼真度和质量上与真实临床图像在统计上无法区分,为创建用于地标定位、分割和分类等机器学习应用的大规模神经影像数据集提供了一种新方法。

英文摘要:

Machine learning in neurosurgery is limited by challenges in assembling large, high-quality imaging datasets. Synthetic data offers a scalable, privacy-preserving solution. We evaluated the feasibility of generating realistic lateral cervical spine radiographs using a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) trained on 4,963 images from the Cervical Spine X-ray Atlas. Model performance was monitored via training/validation loss and Frechet inception distance, and synthetic image quality was assessed in a blinded "clinical Turing test" with six neuroradiologists and two spine-fellowship trained neurosurgeons. Experts reviewed 50 quartets containing one real and three synthetic images, identifying the real image and rating realism on a 4-point Likert scale. Experts correctly identified the real image in 29% of trials (Fleiss' kappa=0.061). Mean realism scores were comparable between real (3.323) and synthetic images (3.228, 3.258, and 3.320; p=0.383, 0.471, 1.000). Nearest-neighbor analysis found no evidence of memorization. We also provide a dataset of 20,063 synthetic radiographs. These results demonstrate that DDPM-generated cervical spine X-rays are statistically indistinguishable in realism and quality from real clinical images, offering a novel approach to creating large-scale neuroimaging datasets for ML applications in landmarking, segmentation, and classification.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑