arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2510.04723cs.CV

野生动物场景下单目度量深度估计基准

Benchmark on Monocular Metric Depth Estimation in Wildlife Setting

University of Firenze(佛罗伦萨大学)

Niccolò Niccoli, Lorenzo Seidenari, Ilaria Greco, Francesco Rovero

AI总结:

该研究提出首个野生动物监测场景下单目度量深度估计基准,评估了4种主流MDE方法与几何基线,明确了各方法的精度与效率差异,为保护监测系统的深度估计应用提供参考。

摘要:

相机陷阱被广泛应用于野生动物监测,但由于缺乏深度信息,从单目图像中提取准确的距离测量值仍然具有挑战性。尽管单目深度估计(MDE)方法已取得显著进展,但其在自然野生动物环境中的性能尚未得到系统评估。本工作提出了首个面向野生动物监测场景的单目度量深度估计基准。我们评估了四种最先进的MDE方法(Depth Anything V2、ML Depth Pro、ZoeDepth和Metric3D)以及一个几何基线,实验基于93张相机陷阱图像,使用经校准的ChARUCO图案获取真实距离作为 ground truth。结果表明,Depth Anything V2取得了最佳整体性能,平均绝对误差为0.454米,相关系数为0.962;而ZoeDepth等方法在室外自然环境中性能出现显著下降(平均绝对误差:3.087米)。我们发现,在所有深度学习方法中,基于中位数的深度提取方法始终优于基于均值的方法。此外,我们还分析了计算效率:ZoeDepth速度最快(每张图像0.17秒)但精度最低,而Depth Anything V2在精度和速度之间实现了最优平衡(每张图像0.22秒)。该基准为野生动物应用建立了性能基线,并为在保护监测系统中部署深度估计提供了实用指导。

英文摘要:

Camera traps are widely used for wildlife monitoring, but extracting accurate distance measurements from monocular images remains challenging due to the lack of depth information. While monocular depth estimation (MDE) methods have advanced significantly, their performance in natural wildlife environments has not been systematically evaluated. This work introduces the first benchmark for monocular metric depth estimation in wildlife monitoring conditions. We evaluate four state-of-the-art MDE methods (Depth Anything V2, ML Depth Pro, ZoeDepth, and Metric3D) alongside a geometric baseline on 93 camera trap images with ground truth distances obtained using calibrated ChARUCO patterns. Our results demonstrate that Depth Anything V2 achieves the best overall performance with a mean absolute error of 0.454m and correlation of 0.962, while methods like ZoeDepth show significant degradation in outdoor natural environments (MAE: 3.087m). We find that median-based depth extraction consistently outperforms mean-based approaches across all deep learning methods. Additionally, we analyze computational efficiency, with ZoeDepth being fastest (0.17s per image) but least accurate, while Depth Anything V2 provides an optimal balance of accuracy and speed (0.22s per image). This benchmark establishes performance baselines for wildlife applications and provides practical guidance for implementing depth estimation in conservation monitoring systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑