arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2504.07729cs.CVcs.AI

面向多参数T1加权腹部MRI的多器官分割工具基准评测

Benchmarking Multi-Organ Segmentation Tools for Multi-Parametric T1-weighted Abdominal MRI

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center(美国国立卫生研究院临床中心)

Nicole Tran, Anisa Prasad, Yan Zhuang, Tejas Sudharshan Mathai, Boah Kim, Sydney Lewis, Pritam Mukherjee, Jianfei Liu, Ronald M. Summers

AI总结:

本文在Duke Liver Dataset的40个多参数T1加权腹部MRI体积上评测了MRSegmentator、TotalSegmentator MRI和TotalVibeSegmentator三种多器官分割工具,发现MRSegmentator在不同序列类型上表现最佳。

摘要:

在多参数MRI研究中,多器官分割对于放射学的许多应用至关重要,例如将影像生物标志物与疾病状态(如肝硬化、糖尿病)相关联。最近,三个公开可用的工具被提出用于MRI中的多器官分割,分别是MRSegmentator(MRSeg)、TotalSegmentator MRI(TS)和TotalVibeSegmentator(VIBE)。然而,这些工具在特定MRI序列类型上的性能尚未得到量化。在本工作中,从公开的Duke Liver Dataset中筛选出一个包含40个体积的子集。该筛选数据集分别包含来自对比剂注射前脂肪饱和T1、动脉期T1w、静脉期T1w和延迟期T1w四个时相的各10个体积。在这些体积中手动标注了十个腹部结构。随后,在该筛选数据集上对三个公开工具的性能进行了基准评测。结果表明,MRSeg获得了80.7 ± 18.6的Dice分数和8.9 ± 10.4 mm的Hausdorff Distance(HD)误差。与TS和VIBE相比,MRSeg在不同序列类型上表现最佳(p < .05)。

英文摘要:

The segmentation of multiple organs in multi-parametric MRI studies is critical for many applications in radiology, such as correlating imaging biomarkers with disease status (e.g., cirrhosis, diabetes). Recently, three publicly available tools, such as MRSegmentator (MRSeg), TotalSegmentator MRI (TS), and TotalVibeSegmentator (VIBE), have been proposed for multi-organ segmentation in MRI. However, the performance of these tools on specific MRI sequence types has not yet been quantified. In this work, a subset of 40 volumes from the public Duke Liver Dataset was curated. The curated dataset contained 10 volumes each from the pre-contrast fat saturated T1, arterial T1w, venous T1w, and delayed T1w phases, respectively. Ten abdominal structures were manually annotated in these volumes. Next, the performance of the three public tools was benchmarked on this curated dataset. The results indicated that MRSeg obtained a Dice score of 80.7 $\pm$ 18.6 and Hausdorff Distance (HD) error of 8.9 $\pm$ 10.4 mm. It fared the best ($p < .05$) across the different sequence types in contrast to TS and VIBE.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑