arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.08042cs.CL

LSC-Eval:一个利用LLM生成合成数据评估词汇语义变化维度测量方法的通用框架

LSC-Eval: A General Framework to Evaluate Methods for Assessing Dimensions of Lexical Semantic Change Using LLM-Generated Synthetic Data

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学心理学科学学院);School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学计算与信息学院);School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London(伦敦女王学院电子工程与计算机科学学院);The Alan Turing Institute, London(伦敦艾伦·图灵研究所);Language Technology Lab, University of Cambridge(剑桥大学语言技术实验室)

Naomi Baes, Raphaël Merx, Nick Haslam, Ekaterina Vylomova, Haim Dubossarsky

AI总结:

本文提出LSC-Eval通用评估框架,利用LLM生成合成数据模拟词汇语义变化,验证了合成基准的有效性并揭示现有模型在情感维度检测上的不足。

摘要:

词汇语义变化(LSC)为文化和社会动态提供了洞见。然而,由于缺乏历史基准数据集,测量不同类型LSC的方法的有效性仍未得到确立。为弥补这一空白,我们提出了LSC-Eval,一个新颖的三阶段通用评估框架,旨在:(1)开发一种可扩展的方法,利用上下文学习(In-Context Learning)和词汇数据库生成模拟理论驱动的LSC的合成数据集;(2)使用这些数据集评估计算方法对合成变化的敏感性;(3)评估它们在检测特定维度和领域变化方面的适用性。我们将LSC-Eval应用于模拟SIBling框架中定义的情感(Sentiment)、强度(Intensity)和广度(Breadth)(SIB)维度上的变化,使用心理学中的示例。然后,我们评估所选方法检测这些受控干预的能力。我们的研究结果验证了合成基准的有效性,证明了定制方法能够有效检测SIB维度上的变化,并揭示了一个最先进的LSC模型在检测LSC的情感维度方面面临挑战。LSC-Eval为LSC方法的维度和领域特定基准测试提供了一个有价值的工具,尤其与社会科学相关。

英文摘要:

Lexical Semantic Change (LSC) provides insight into cultural and social dynamics. Yet, the validity of methods for measuring different kinds of LSC remains unestablished due to the absence of historical benchmark datasets. To address this gap, we propose LSC-Eval, a novel three-stage general-purpose evaluation framework to: (1) develop a scalable methodology for generating synthetic datasets that simulate theory-driven LSC using In-Context Learning and a lexical database; (2) use these datasets to evaluate the sensitivity of computational methods to synthetic change; and (3) assess their suitability for detecting change in specific dimensions and domains. We apply LSC-Eval to simulate changes along the Sentiment, Intensity, and Breadth (SIB) dimensions, as defined in the SIBling framework, using examples from psychology. We then evaluate the ability of selected methods to detect these controlled interventions. Our findings validate the use of synthetic benchmarks, demonstrate that tailored methods effectively detect changes along SIB dimensions, and reveal that a state-of-the-art LSC model faces challenges in detecting affective dimensions of LSC. LSC-Eval offers a valuable tool for dimension- and domain-specific benchmarking of LSC methods, with particular relevance to the social sciences.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑