arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2604.09497cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

BERT-as-a-Judge: 一种更稳健的替代方法,用于高效参考基于的大语言模型评估

BERT-as-a-Judge: A Robust Alternative to Lexical Methods for Efficient Reference-Based LLM Evaluation

Artefact Research Center(Artefact 研究中心);Diabolocom;Cohere

Hippolyte Gisserot-Boukhlef, Nicolas Boizard, Emmanuel Malherbe, Céline Hudelot, Pierre Colombo

AI总结:

本文提出BERT-as-a-Judge,通过编码器驱动的方法评估参考基于的生成结果,克服了传统词汇方法的局限,提供高效且可靠的评估方案。

摘要:

准确的评估对大语言模型(LLM)生态系统至关重要,指导模型选择和下游应用。然而,实践中通常依赖刚性的词汇方法来提取和评估答案,这可能将模型的真实问题解决能力与预定义格式指南的合规性混淆。虽然最近的LLM-as-a-Judge方法通过评估语义正确性而非严格结构一致性缓解了这一问题,但它们引入了显著的计算开销,使评估成本高昂。在本文中,我们首先通过覆盖36个模型和15个下游任务的大型实证研究系统地探讨了词汇评估的局限性,证明此类方法与人类判断相关性差。为了解决这一限制,我们引入了BERT-as-a-Judge,一种用于评估参考基于生成设置中答案正确性的编码器驱动方法,对输出措辞的变化具有鲁棒性,并且仅需在合成标注的问题-候选-参考三元组上进行轻量级训练。我们展示了它在词汇基线上的持续表现优于,同时在性能上与较大的LLM法官相匹配,提供了两种方法之间的有吸引力的权衡,并使可靠的、可扩展的评估成为可能。最后,通过广泛的实验,我们提供了关于BERT-as-a-Judge性能的详细见解,为从业者提供实用指导,并释放所有项目工件以促进下游应用。

英文摘要:

Accurate evaluation is central to the large language model (LLM) ecosystem, guiding model selection and downstream adoption across diverse use cases. In practice, however, evaluating generative outputs typically relies on rigid lexical methods to extract and assess answers, which can conflate a model's true problem-solving ability with its compliance with predefined formatting guidelines. While recent LLM-as-a-Judge approaches mitigate this issue by assessing semantic correctness rather than strict structural conformity, they also introduce substantial computational overhead, making evaluation costly. In this work, we first systematically investigate the limitations of lexical evaluation through a large-scale empirical study spanning 36 models and 15 downstream tasks, demonstrating that such methods correlate poorly with human judgments. To address this limitation, we introduce BERT-as-a-Judge, an encoder-driven approach for assessing answer correctness in reference-based generative settings, robust to variations in output phrasing, and requiring only lightweight training on synthetically annotated question-candidate-reference triplets. We show that it consistently outperforms the lexical baseline while matching the performance of much larger LLM judges, providing a compelling trade-off between the two and enabling reliable, scalable evaluation. Finally, through extensive experimentation, we provide detailed insights into BERT-as-a-Judge's performance to offer practical guidance for practitioners, and release all project artifacts to foster downstream adoption.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑