arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2501.13690eess.IVcs.CV

变分U-Net与局部对齐用于不同场强下乳腺MRI数据的联合肿瘤提取与配准(VALOR-Net)

Variational U-Net with Local Alignment for Joint Tumor Extraction and Registration (VALOR-Net) of Breast MRI Data Acquired at Two Different Field Strengths

University of Peshawar(白沙瓦大学);Danube Private University(多瑙河私立大学);University of Engineering & Technology, Peshawar(白沙瓦工程与技术大学);Medical University of Vienna(维也纳医科大学);Karl Landsteiner Society(卡尔·兰施泰纳学会);University of Cambridge(剑桥大学)

Muhammad Shahkar Khan, Haider Ali, Laura Villazan Garcia, Noor Badshah, Siegfried Trattnig, Florian Schwarzhans, Ramona Woitek, Olgica Zaric

AI总结:

提出VALOR-Net变分U-Net局部对齐网络,联合配准与分割不同场强(3T/7T)乳腺MRI,实现肿瘤分割与图像对齐,初步验证可行。

摘要:

背景:多参数乳腺MRI数据可能改善肿瘤诊断、表征和治疗规划。在不同场强(如3T和7T)下获取的图像之间的精确对齐和分割仍然是具有挑战性的研究任务。目的:解决对齐挑战并实现跨不同MRI场强的一致肿瘤分割。研究类型:回顾性研究。受试者:共纳入九名患有乳腺肿瘤的女性受试者:六例经组织学证实的浸润性导管癌(IDC)和三例纤维腺瘤。场强/序列:使用3T和7T扫描仪,采用对比后T1加权三维时间分辨随机轨迹血管造影(TWIST)序列进行成像。评估:使用多种定量指标评估联合图像配准和肿瘤分割方法的性能,包括信噪比(PSNR)、结构相似性指数(SSIM)、归一化互相关(NCC)、Dice系数、F1分数和相对平方差之和(rel SSD)。统计检验:使用皮尔逊相关系数检验配准与分割指标之间的关系。结果:当对每个受试者单独计算时,PSNR范围在27.5至34.5 dB之间,SSIM在82.6%至92.8%之间。该模型实现了NCC在96.4%至99.3%之间,Dice系数在62.9%至95.3%之间。F1分数在55.4%至93.2%之间,rel SSD在2.0%至7.5%范围内。分割指标Dice和F1分数高度相关(0.995),而配准指标NCC和SSIM之间发现中等相关性(0.681)。数据结论:初步结果表明,所提出的方法可能为在不同场强下获取的MRI数据提供联合肿瘤分割和配准是可行的。

英文摘要:

Background: Multiparametric breast MRI data might improve tumor diagnostics, characterization, and treatment planning. Accurate alignment and delineation of images acquired at different field strengths such as 3T and 7T, remain challenging research tasks. Purpose: To address alignment challenges and enable consistent tumor segmentation across different MRI field strengths. Study type: Retrospective. Subjects: Nine female subjects with breast tumors were involved: six histologically proven invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) and three fibroadenomas. Field strength/sequence: Imaging was performed at 3T and 7T scanners using post-contrast T1-weighted three-dimensional time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) sequence. Assessments: The method's performance for joint image registration and tumor segmentation was evaluated using several quantitative metrics, including signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), normalized cross-correlation (NCC), Dice coefficient, F1 score, and relative sum of squared differences (rel SSD). Statistical tests: The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test the relationship between the registration and segmentation metrics. Results: When calculated for each subject individually, the PSNR was in a range from 27.5 to 34.5 dB, and the SSIM was from 82.6 to 92.8%. The model achieved an NCC from 96.4 to 99.3% and a Dice coefficient of 62.9 to 95.3%. The F1 score was between 55.4 and 93.2% and the rel SSD was in the range of 2.0 and 7.5%. The segmentation metrics Dice and F1 Score are highly correlated (0.995), while a moderate correlation between NCC and SSIM (0.681) was found for registration. Data conclusion: Initial results demonstrate that the proposed method may be feasible in providing joint tumor segmentation and registration of MRI data acquired at different field strengths.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑