arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2305.18033eess.IVcs.CV

ACROBAT 2022挑战赛:乳腺癌组织的自动配准

The ACROBAT 2022 Challenge: Automatic Registration Of Breast Cancer Tissue

Karolinska Institutet(卡罗林斯卡学院);University of Turku(图尔库大学);University of Eastern Finland(东芬兰大学);Zealand University Hospital(西兰大学医院);Gestalt Diagnostics(格式塔诊断公司);Moffitt Cancer Center(莫菲特癌症中心);University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland(瑞士西部应用科学大学);AGH University of Kraków(克拉科夫AGH科技大学);University of Geneva(日内瓦大学);University of Padova(帕多瓦大学);Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS(弗劳恩霍夫数字医学MEVIS研究所);University of Twente(特温特大学);Muroran Institute of Technology(室兰工业大学);Niigata University of Health and Welfare(新潟医疗福祉大学);Konica Minolta, Inc.(柯尼卡美能达株式会社);University of Alberta(阿尔伯塔大学);Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute(阿尔伯塔机器智能研究所);Karolinska University Hospital(卡罗林斯卡大学医院);Tampere University(坦佩雷大学)
Philippe Weitz, Masi Valkonen, Leslie Solorzano, Circe Carr, Kimmo Kartasalo, Constance Boissin, Sonja Koivukoski, Aino Kuusela, Dusan Rasic, Yanbo Feng, Sandra… 展开作者

Philippe Weitz, Masi Valkonen, Leslie Solorzano, Circe Carr, Kimmo Kartasalo, Constance Boissin, Sonja Koivukoski, Aino Kuusela, Dusan Rasic, Yanbo Feng, Sandra Sinius Pouplier, Abhinav Sharma, Kajsa Ledesma Eriksson, Stephanie Robertson, Christian Marzahl, Chandler D. Gatenbee, Alexander R. A. Anderson, Marek Wodzinski, Artur Jurgas, Niccolò Marini, Manfredo Atzori, Henning Müller, Daniel Budelmann, Nick Weiss, Stefan Heldmann, Johannes Lotz, Jelmer M. Wolterink, Bruno De Santi, Abhijeet Patil, Amit Sethi, Satoshi Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Kousuke Hirasawa, Mahtab Farrokh, Neeraj Kumar, Russell Greiner, Leena Latonen, Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm, Johan Hartman, Pekka Ruusuvuori, Mattias Rantalainen

AI总结:

针对全切片图像配准技术现状不明的问题,ACROBAT挑战赛基于大规模乳腺癌WSI数据集,比较八种配准算法,确立当前最优水平并指导方法选择。

摘要:

组织病理学全切片图像(WSI)中组织之间的对齐对于研究和临床应用至关重要。计算、深度学习方面的进步以及大规模WSI数据集的可用性已经彻底改变了WSI分析。因此,当前WSI配准的最先进技术水平尚不明确。为了解决这一问题,我们举办了ACROBAT挑战赛,基于迄今为止最大的WSI配准数据集,包括来自1,152名乳腺癌患者的4,212张WSI。挑战的目标是将用常规诊断免疫组织化学染色的组织WSI与其H&E染色的对应图像进行对齐。我们比较了八种WSI配准算法的性能,并调查了不同WSI属性和临床协变量的影响。我们发现,概念上不同的WSI配准方法可以实现高度准确的配准性能,并识别出影响不同方法性能的协变量。这些结果确立了当前WSI配准的最先进技术水平,并为研究人员选择和发展方法提供了指导。

英文摘要:

The alignment of tissue between histopathological whole-slide-images (WSI) is crucial for research and clinical applications. Advances in computing, deep learning, and availability of large WSI datasets have revolutionised WSI analysis. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration is unclear. To address this, we conducted the ACROBAT challenge, based on the largest WSI registration dataset to date, including 4,212 WSIs from 1,152 breast cancer patients. The challenge objective was to align WSIs of tissue that was stained with routine diagnostic immunohistochemistry to its H&E-stained counterpart. We compare the performance of eight WSI registration algorithms, including an investigation of the impact of different WSI properties and clinical covariates. We find that conceptually distinct WSI registration methods can lead to highly accurate registration performances and identify covariates that impact performances across methods. These results establish the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration and guide researchers in selecting and developing methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑